Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on April 8, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp162
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/7/2269    most recent
gfp162v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grinyó, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brunet, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grinyó, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brunet, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients receiving standard-dose or low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus or low-dose sirolimus: the Symphony pharmacokinetic substudy

Josep M. Grinyó1, Henrik Ekberg2, Richard D. Mamelok3, Federico Oppenheimer4, Jaime Sánchez-Plumed5, Miguel Angel Gentil6, Domingo Hernandez7, Dirk R. Kuypers8 and Mercé Brunet4

1 Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain 2 Lund University, Malmö, Sweden 3 Mamelok Consulting, Palo Alto, CA, USA 4 Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona 5 HU La Fe, Valencia 6 Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla 7 Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain 8 University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Josep M. Grinyó; E-mail: jgrinyo{at}bellvitgehospital.cat



  Abstract

Background. Exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA), the primary active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), is correlated with therapeutic efficacy of MMF but varies depending on the concomitantly administered immunosuppressive drugs.

Methods. A 3-month pharmacokinetic substudy of the prospective, randomized, multicentre, open-label Symphony study was performed. Eighty-three adult renal transplant patients received standard-dose cyclosporine, MMF 2 g/day and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, MMF 2 g/day and corticosteroids plus low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus or low-dose sirolimus. The area under the concentration–time curve (AUC0–12) of MPA and its metabolites between treatment groups was compared. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed before MMF administration and at 20, 40, 75 min; 2, 3, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h post-dose on Day 7 and Months 1 and 3.

Results. Compared with standard-dose cyclosporine, patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus or low-dose sirolimus had significantly higher AUC0–12 values for MPA at Day 7 and Month 1 and for free MPA at Day 7, and significantly lower AUC0–12 values for 7-O-MPA-glucuronide (MPAG) at Month 1 and for acyl-glucuronide at Months 1 and 3 (P < 0.05). AUC0–12 of MPA and free MPA was significantly greater with low-dose tacrolimus and low-dose sirolimus than with low-dose cyclosporine in the first month (P < 0.05). The ratio of MPA to MPAG exposure was significantly higher in the three low-dose groups than in the standard-dose cyclosporine group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions. Standard- and low-dose cyclosporine reduces the exposure of MPA and free MPA compared to low-dose tacrolimus or low-dose sirolimus in patients given the same dose of MMF.

Keywords: mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid; mycophenolic acid glucuronide; pharmacokinetics; renal transplantation

Received for publication: 27.10.08
Accepted in revised form: 10. 3.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.