Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on February 11, 2009

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/1672    most recent
gfp020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magistroni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albertazzi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magistroni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albertazzi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Proteomic analysis of urine from proteinuric patients shows a proteolitic activity directed against albumin

Riccardo Magistroni1, Giulia Ligabue1, Valentina Lupo1, Luciana Furci1, Marco Leonelli1, Luca Manganelli1, Mario Masellis2, Valentina Gatti1, Fabrizio Cavazzini1, Walter Tizzanini3 and Alberto Albertazzi1

1 Division of Nephrology Dialisys and Transplantation, Dipartimento Integrato Medicine e Specialità Mediche, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy 2 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 3 Chemical and Clinical Analysis Laboratory, Department of Laboratories, Patologic Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Riccardo Magistroni, Divisione di Nefrologia Dialisi e Trapianto, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Universitá di Modena e Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71 41100 Modena. Tel: +0039-059-4224135; Fax: +0039-059-4222167; E-mail: riccardo.magistroni{at}unimore.it



  Abstract

Background. Nephrotic syndrome is a condition that is clinically associated with poor outcome. In this study, we compared different techniques of urine sample preparation in order to develop a robust analytical protocol to define the differential urinary proteome of urinary abnormalities compared to nephrotic proteinuria.

Methods. We recruited 5 normal control subjects, 16 patients with urinary abnormalities and 16 patients with nephrotic syndrome. Proteins from normal urine were processed using three different protocols [acetone, ultrafiltration and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation], depletion of albumin and IgGs and then analysed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) gels and mass spectrometry.

Results. Comparing the three extraction methods by visual inspection of gels after 2D gel electrophoresis, the acetone precipitation and TCA methods yielded the best quality of protein extraction, while the acetone precipitation method was the most efficient. Furthermore, we tested three commercial kits for albumin and IgG depletion. We applied the optimized acetone extraction protocol to compare urinary samples from nephrotic patients (NP) to urinary samples obtained from patients presenting with urinary abnormalities (UAP). We observed a proteolytic activity directed against albumin. This observation was more prevalent in urinary samples from NP than from UAP. Within both groups, there was some inter-individual variability in the observed proteolytic activity. An increased concentration of alpha1 antitrypsin was also observed in urine of NP. We analysed albumin fragmentation by 1D and 2D western blots in the same samples skipping the albumin and IgG depletion steps to avoid the possible confound of albumin fragment removal. The analysis confirmed a stronger proteolytic activity in the nephrotic group.

Conclusions. The proteolytic activity against albumin and the anti-proteolytic activity of alpha1 antitrypsin are likely linked and could play an important role in the nephrotic process. If replicated in larger samples, this methodology may lead to a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological process of nephrotic syndrome.

Keywords: albumin; kidney; nephrotic syndrome; proteomic; urine

Received for publication: 7. 5.08
Accepted in revised form: 12. 1.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.