Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on October 16, 2008

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn564
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/877    most recent
gfn564v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naumovic, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nesic, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naumovic, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nesic, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Renal biopsy registry from a single centre in Serbia: 20 years of experience

Radomir Naumovic1, Stevan Pavlovic1, Dragisa Stojkovic1, Gordana Basta-Jovanovic2 and Vidosava Nesic1

1 Clinic of Nephrology, Clinical Center of Serbia 2 Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Pathology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Radomir Naumovic, Clinic of Nephrology, Institute of Urology and Nephrology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Pasterova 2, 11000 Beograd, Serbia. Tel: +381-656661420; Fax: +381-113617127; E-mail: rnaumovic{at}drenik.net



  Abstract

Background. There is not enough epidemiologic data of biopsy proven renal diseases. This is the first report of clinicopathologic correlations over a period of 20 years from central Balkan country-Serbia.

Methods. A retrospective review of reports of 2 362 native renal biopsies performed on patients at the leading nephrology unit in Serbia from 1987 to 2006 was undertaken. Patients were divided in two groups according to age: younger (<60 years old) and older (≥60 years old).

Results. The annual incidence of renal biopsies increased from 3.9 p.m.p./year in 1987 to 12.5 p.m.p/year in 2006. The most common clinical syndrome as an indication for renal biopsy was nephrotic syndrome (NS) (53.6%). Membranous nephropathy was the most frequent cause of NS (21.6%). Primary glomerulonephritis (PGN) accounted for about two thirds of all performed biopsies. Non-IgA mesangioproliferative GN was the most frequent primary GN accounting for almost 25% of all PGN in our whole population, while the prevalence of IgA nephropathy was only 12%. Lupus nephritis was the most frequent secondary glomerulonephritis (75.6%).

Conclusions. This report represents epidemiological overview on biopsy proven renal disease coming from one specific Balkan country, which was under economic sanctions for almost half the studied period. We are hoping that this register will be the basis for developing not only a national register but also a register that will encompass all Balkan countries.

Keywords: biopsy; glomerulopathy; registry; renal

Received for publication: 5. 3.08
Accepted in revised form: 16. 9.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. B. Hanko, R. N. Mullan, D. M. O'Rourke, P. T. McNamee, A. P. Maxwell, and A. E. Courtney
The changing pattern of adult primary glomerular disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 3050 - 3054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.