NDT Advance Access published online on July 28, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn420
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Urine pH in renal calcium stone formers who do and do not increase stone phosphate content with time
1 Nephrology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 2 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Elaine M. Worcester, Nephrology Section/MC 5100, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Tel: +1-773-702-1475; Fax: +1-773-702-5818; E-mail: eworcest@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Keywords: calcium phosphate; kidney stones; lithotripsy; urine pH
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Introduction |
|---|
Most calcium stones are composed primarily of calcium oxalate (CaOx) [1]. Stones composed primarily (>50%) of calcium phosphate (CaP) are less common [2] and seem preferentially likely in women; we found that 47% of CaP stone formers (SF) were female, compared with only 26% of CaOx SF. Idiopathic CaOx SF have no evidence of renal epithelial cell injury on papillary biopsy [3], while CaP SF plug their inner medullary collecting ducts (IMCD) and ducts of Bellini with apatite crystals [4]. For this reason, formation of CaP stones may well be a clinically undesirable event.
It is therefore worrisome that we [2] and others [5] have noted an increase in the prevalence of CaP in stones over the past two decades. Mandel found increased CaP in recurrent stones. CaP SF have high urine CaP supersaturation (SS), due to high
| Subjects and methods |
|---|
Patients
Idiopathic calcium SF
Transformers
Transformers whose 24-h urine studies preceded transformation
Controls, who did not transform
Stone analysis
Laboratory evaluation
Clinical analysis
Calculations and statistical analysis
| Results |
|---|
Comparison of urine and stone measurements between T and C
Comparison of urine and stone measurements between TP and C
| ESWL |
|---|
ESWL and urine pH are not related
T were given more citrate and thiazide than C
| Discussion |
|---|
Urine pH and SS CaP are higher in T versus C before transformation has occurred
Higher urine pH is not likely due to IMCD CaP deposits
The role of ESWL is unclear
T were given more citrate and thiazide than C but not clearly before transformation
| Summary |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Worcester and F. L. Coe Does Idiopathic Hypercalciuria Trigger Calcium-Sensing Receptor-Mediated Protection from Urinary Supersaturation? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2009; 20(8): 1657 - 1659. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
