Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 19, 2007

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm597
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/659    most recent
gfm597v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calderon-Margalit, R.
Right arrow Articles by Haklai, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calderon-Margalit, R.
Right arrow Articles by Haklai, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Dialysis in Israel, 1989–2005—time trends and international comparisons

Ronit Calderon-Margalit1, Ethel-Sherry Gordon2, Moshe Hoshen1, Jeremy D. Kark1, Anat Rotem2 and Ziona Haklai2

1Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, and 2Department of Health Information and Computer Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Ronit Calderon-Margalit, MD, MPH, Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, POB 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. Email: ronitc{at}ekmd.huji.ac.il



  Abstract

Background. A universal increase in the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) was reported in developed countries during the 1990s, especially among the elderly and diabetic patients. We studied trends in RRT incidence and mortality in Israel between 1989 and 2001–2005.

Methods. The end-stage renal disease (ESRD) registry holds data on all RRT patients in Israel. Age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (RRs) were estimated comparing 2001–2005 with 1989. We compared incidence data between Israel and elsewhere using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Survival analysis was conducted by the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards regression was used to compare survival of diabetic with non-diabetic ESRD patients.

Results. The mean incidence rates per million population increased from 99 in 1989–1991 to 179 in 2003–2005. In 2000, Israel was the second leading country for incidence of RRT.

Age-adjusted incidence rates increased by 67% [95% confidence interval (CI): 49–87%], from 1989 to 2001, but the trend was attenuated between 2002 and 2005. The increase in incidence was positively associated with age, the largest increase being among the elderly aged ≥75 years (RR: 3.18, 95%CI: 2.72–3.70). Diabetes accounted for 41% of RRT in 2001 vs only 19% in 1989. There was no increase in 1-year survival between the beginning and the end of the study period. Patients with diabetes-associated RRT had 57% increased risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.57 95% CI: 1.51–1.63).

Conclusions. Despite a similar proportion of RRT attributed to diabetes in Israel and other countries, the age-adjusted incidence in Israel is considerably higher than most countries.

Keywords: end-stage renal disease; incidence; renal replacement therapy; secular trends; survival

Received for publication: 10. 4.07
Accepted in revised form: 1. 8.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.