Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on September 27, 2006

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl529
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/218    most recent
gfl529v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández Reyes, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Selgas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández Reyes, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Selgas, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received July 29, 2005
Accepted August 9, 2006


Original Article

Inherent high peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration deficiency: their mid-term clinical relevance

María-José Fernández Reyes 1, María-Auxiliadora Bajo 2 *, Covadonga Hevía 2, Gloria del Peso 2, Silvia Ros 2, Auxiliadora García de Miguel 2, Antonio Cirugeda 3, María-José Castro 2, José A. Sánchez-Tomero 3, and Rafael Selgas 2

1 Servicios de Nefrología de I Hospital General de Segovia, Spain
2 Hospital Universitario La Paz de Madrid, Spain
3 y Hospital Universitario de la Princesa de Madrid, Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigaciones Nefrológicas, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
María-Auxiliadora Bajo, E-mail: mabajo.hulp{at}salud.madrid.org



  Abstract

Background. High peritoneal transport has been associated with poorer outcome in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, but not necessarily because of PD-dependent conditions. Our primary objective was to analyse the influences of baseline peritoneal small solute transport and ultrafiltration (UF) capacity on patient and technique survival, after adjusting for comorbid conditions. A secondary objective was to determine whether high transport was associated with basal comorbidity.

Methods. In this prospective observational patient/technique survival study, we followed 410 patients who started PD. At the baseline, we collected data to define comorbidities, tally the Charlson index, determine the baseline mass transfer area coefficients (MTAC) of urea and creatinine, net UF, plasma albumin and residual renal function (RRF). No data other than the information on patient and technique survival were recorded after baseline.

Results. The mean follow-up was 33 ± 28 months. Dropouts during the study were due to renal transplantation in 140 cases, death in 142 cases and transfer to haemodialysis (HD) in 77 cases. Patients with inherent UF deficiency, high transport rate or both were not significantly different in the survival analysis from the rest. In the Cox hazards analysis, only age, Charlson index and a lower RRF were the significant mortality risk factors. None of the baseline parameters studied was a predictor of technique failure. High transporter patients had lower plasma albumin and UF capacity, comorbidity and more frequent liver diseases than the rest. Moderate to severe liver disease (n = 14) was significantly associated with the inherent high transport status, but was never accompanied by UF failure (UFF). UFF patients showed higher RRF, creatinine-MTAC and age.

Conclusions. Neither the high transport nor the inherent UFF status has any influence on patient and technique survival. The inherent high small solute transport status is associated with hypoalbuminaemia and a greater comorbidity index. The Charlson index, age and lower RRF are the only independent predictors of mortality. Technique dropout is not predicted by any of the variables studied at the baseline.

Keywords: fast peritoneal transport; PD outcomes; ultrafiltration.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
pdiHome page
J. Portoles, G. del Peso, M. J. Fernandez-Reyes, M. A. Bajo, P. Lopez-Sanchez, and the GCDP
PREVIOUS COMORBIDITY AND LACK OF PATIENT FREE CHOICE OF TECHNIQUE PREDICT EARLY MORTALITY IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
Perit. Dial. Int., March 1, 2009; 29(2): 150 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
A. M. Cueto-Manzano
RAPID SOLUTE TRANSPORT IN THE PERITONEUM: PHYSIOLOGIC AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES
Perit. Dial. Int., February 1, 2009; 29(Supplement_2): S90 - S95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
Y.-L. Kim
UPDATE ON MECHANISMS OF ULTRAFILTRATION FAILURE
Perit. Dial. Int., February 1, 2009; 29(Supplement_2): S123 - S127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.