NDT Advance Access first published online on May 15, 2006
This version published online on May 23, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl221
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of prediction equations [modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), simplified MDRD, Cockcroft-Gault (CG), reciprocal of creatinine and creatinine clearance] in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods. A total of 525 glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) using 125I-iothalamate were carried out over 10 years in 87 type 2 diabetic patients. Accuracy was evaluated at three levels of renal function according to the baseline values obtained with the isotopic method: hyperfiltration (GFR: >140 ml/min/1.73 m2; 140 isotopic determinations in 27 patients), normal renal function (GFR: 140-90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 294 isotopic determinations in 47 patients) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2-3 (GFR: 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m2; 87 isotopic determinations in 13 patients). The annual slope for GFR (change in GFR expressed as ml/min/year) was considered to ascertain the variability in the equations compared with the isotopic method during follow-up. Student's t-test was used to determine the existence of significant differences between prediction equations and the isotopic method (P < 0.05 with Bonferroni adjusted for five contrast tests). Results. In the subgroup of patients with hyperfiltration, a GFR slope calculated with 125I-iothalamate -4.8 ± 4.7 ml/min/year was obtained. GFR slope in patients with normal renal function was -3.0 ± 2.3 ml/min/year. In both situations, all equations presented a significant underestimation compared with the isotopic GFR (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). In the subgroup of CKD stages 2-3, the slope for GFR with 125I-iothalamate was -1.4 ± 1.8 ml/min/year. The best prediction equation compared with the isotopic method proved to be MDRD with a slope for GFR of -1.4 ± 1.3 ml/min/year (P: NS) compared with the CG formula -1.0 ± 0.9 ml/min/year (P: NS). Creatinine clearance presented the greatest variability in estimation (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In the normal renal function and hyperfiltration groups, none of the prediction equations demonstrated acceptable accuracy owing to excessive underestimation of renal function. In CKD stages 2-3, with mean serum creatinine
Received November 24, 2005
Accepted March 29, 2006
Original Article
Are prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate useful for the long-term monitoring of type 2 diabetic patients?
Néstor Fontseré 1 *,
Isabel Salinas 2,
Jordi Bonal 1,
Beatriz Bayés 1,
Joaquim Riba 3,
Ferran Torres 4,
Jose Rios 4,
Ana Sanmartí 2,
and
Ramón Romero 1
2 Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
4 Biostatistics and Epidemiology Laboratory, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Néstor Fontseré, E-mail: 34989nfb{at}comb.es
![]()
Abstract
133 µmol/l (1.5 mg/dl), the MDRD equation can be used to estimate GFR during the monitoring and follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin, anti-diabetic drugs or both.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A M. Peters, N. J Bird, I. Halsall, C. Peters, and A R. Michell Evaluation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (eGFR) against simultaneous, dual-marker multi-sample measurements of glomerular filtration rate Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fontsere, J. Bonal, I. Salinas, M. R. de Arellano, J. Rios, F. Torres, A. Sanmarti, and R. Romero Is the New Mayo Clinic Quadratic Equation Useful for the Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Type 2 Diabetic Patients? Diabetes Care, December 1, 2008; 31(12): 2265 - 2267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Radbill, B. Murphy, and D. LeRoith Rationale and Strategies for Early Detection and Management of Diabetic Kidney Disease Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2008; 83(12): 1373 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Xie, M. M. Joffe, S. M. Brunelli, G. Beck, G. M. Chertow, J. C. Fink, T. Greene, C.-y. Hsu, J. W. Kusek, R. Landis, et al. A Comparison of Change in Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Nondiabetic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1332 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Beauvieux, F. Le Moigne, C. Lasseur, C. Raffaitin, C. Perlemoine, N. Barthe, P. Chauveau, C. Combe, H. Gin, and V. Rigalleau New Predictive Equations Improve Monitoring of Kidney Function in Patients With Diabetes Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 1988 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Wong Reply Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 959 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rigalleau, C. Lasseur, C. Raffaitin, C. Perlemoine, N. Barthe, P. Chauveau, C. Combe, and H. Gin Prediction of glomerular filtration rate decline in diabetic subjects with impaired renal function Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 959 - 960. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Raffaitin, C. Lasseur, P. Chauveau, N. Barthe, H. Gin, C. Combe, and V. Rigalleau Nutritional status in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a prospective study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 96 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fontsere, J. Bonal, and R. Romero Reply Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 20, 2006; (2006) gfl731v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





