Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on March 22, 2006

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl096
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1833    most recent
gfl096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kömhoff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seyberth, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kömhoff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seyberth, H. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received July 28, 2005
Accepted February 17, 2006


Original Article

Increased systolic blood pressure with rofecoxib in congenital furosemide-like salt loss

Martin Kömhoff 1 *, Günter Klaus 1, Sofia Nazarowa 2, Stephan C. Reinalter 1, and Hannsjörg W. Seyberth 1

1 Department of Pediatrics, Philipps University Marburg, D-35033 Marburg, Germany
2 Setchenov Moscow Medical Academy, 11988 Moscow, Russian Federation

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Martin Kömhoff, E-mail: koemhoff{at}med.uni-marburg.de



  Abstract

Background. To analyse whether congenital furosemide- or thiazide-like renal salt loss protects against the potential prohypertensive effects of two cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors: rofecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, and indomethacin, an unselective COX-inhibitor.

Methods. In a retrospective analysis, the effects of rofecoxib and indomethacin on blood pressure (bp: transformed into age-independent standard deviation scores (SDS) values), creatinine clearance (CRC), fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa), and renal excretion of systemic prostaglandins were studied in 28 patients with a genetically proven congenital hypokalaemic salt-losing tubulopathy (SLT) (11 female and 17 male, age: 2-25 years), 19 with a furosemide-like SLT, and nine with a thiazide-like SLT.

Results. In furosemide-like SLT patients, systolic SDS bp values were significantly higher with rofecoxib (1.03±0.16 SDS, n = 107) compared with indomethacin (0.56±0.09 SDS, n = 282; P = 0.007, 95% CI: 0.12-0.8). Without the drugs, systolic SDS bp values were elevated by 0.63±0.11 SDS, n = 164. Both drugs reduced renin and aldosterone-plasma levels to a similar extent. SDS values were significantly correlated with the excretion of the vasoconstrictor thromboxane (T x B2) (R2: 0.038, P = 0.021, n: 159), but not with CRC or FeNa. Blood pressure was not increased in thiazide-like SLT patients treated with rofecoxib.

Conclusion. Congenital furosemide-like renal salt loss does not protect against the prohypertensive effects of rofecoxib. The positive correlation between bp SDS values with T x B2 but not with FeNa or CRC point towards an altered vascular homeostasis as one mechanism increasing blood pressure.

Keywords: Bartter syndrome; coxib; hypertension; NSAID; thromboxane.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Klein, M. Eltze, T. Grebe, A. Hatzelmann, and M. Komhoff
Celecoxib dilates guinea-pig coronaries and rat aortic rings and amplifies NO/cGMP signaling by PDE5 inhibition
Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2007; 75(2): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.