Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on March 22, 2006

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl069
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1952    most recent
gfl069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received November 4, 2005
Accepted February 6, 2006


Original Article

The direct and indirect economic costs incurred by living kidney donors--a systematic review

Katherine S. Clarke 1, Scott Klarenbach 2, Sorina Vlaicu 3, Robert C. Yang 1, Amit X. Garg 4 *, and for the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network

1 Division of Nephrology, University of Western Ontario, London
2 Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton
3 Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, Ontario; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London
4 Division of Nephrology, University of Western Ontario, London; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Amit X. Garg, E-mail: amit.garg{at}lhsc.on.ca



  Abstract

Background. Despite the many benefits of living donor kidney transplantation, economic consequences can result for donors. We reviewed studies which quantified the direct and indirect costs incurred by living kidney donors, in order to understand the strengths and limitations of existing literature.

Methods. We identified relevant studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE and ECONOLIT bibliographic databases, in the Science Citation Index and study reference lists. Any study which reported at least one cost relevant to donors was included. The accuracy of abstracted data was verified by two reviewers and reported in year 2004 US dollars.

Results. Thirty-five studies from 12 countries described costs incurred by individuals who donated between the years 1964 and 2003. No study comprehensively quantified all relevant expenses--the sum of select costs considered in one US study averaged $837 per donor and ranged from $0 to 28 906. Travel and/or accommodation costs were incurred by 9-99% of donors, and were higher in countries with a larger land mass. Post-discharge analgesics were required by 4-24% of donors, but prescription costs were not reported. Between 14 and 30% of donors incurred costs for lost income, with an average loss of $3386 in one study from the UK and $682 in another study from the Netherlands. Costs for dependent care were incurred by 9-44% of donors, while costs for domestic help were incurred by 8% of donors.

Conclusions. Donors incur many types of costs attributable to kidney donation and the total costs are certainly higher than previously reported. To guide informed consent and fair reimbursement policies, further data on all relevant costs, preferably from a detailed prospective multi-centre cohort study, are required.

Keywords: health economics; living kidney donors; reimbursement; systematic review.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. M. Parekh, E. J. Gordon, A. X. Garg, A. D. Waterman, S. Kulkarni, and C. R. Parikh
Living kidney donor informed consent practices vary between US and non-US centers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3316 - 3324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. M. Just, F. Th. de Charro, E. A. Tschosik, L. L. Noe, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and M. C. Riella
Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2365 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. X. Garg, D. Hackam, and M. Tonelli
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 253 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
N. Boudville, G. V. Ramesh Prasad, G. Knoll, N. Muirhead, H. Thiessen-Philbrook, R. C. Yang, M. P. Rosas-Arellano, A. Housawi, A. X. Garg, and for the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR
Meta-analysis: risk for hypertension in living kidney donors.
Ann Intern Med, August 1, 2006; 145(3): 185 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.