Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on January 18, 2006

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfk078
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/5/1328    most recent
gfk078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golestaneh, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mokrzycki, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golestaneh, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mokrzycki, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received April 29, 2005
Accepted December 23, 2005


Original Article

Favourable outcomes in episodes of Pseudomonas bacteraemia when associated with tunnelled cuffed catheters (TCCs) in chronic haemodialysis patients

Ladan Golestaneh 1 *, Jeffrey Laut 1, Stuart Rosenberg 1, Meilin Zhang 1, and Michele H. Mokrzycki 1

1 Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ladan Golestaneh, E-mail: lgolesta{at}montefiore.org



  Abstract

Background. Pseudomonas is regarded as a particularly lethal bacterial isolate. High mortality rates have been reported in episodes of Pseudomonas sepsis when associated with visceral infections as seen in immunosuppressed, hospitalized patients. In comparison, lower mortality rates have been reported with catheter-associated Pseudomonas bacteraemia in non-dialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors and the outcomes for episodes of Pseudomonas bacteraemia associated with the use of tunnelled cuffed haemodialysis catheters (TCCs) in a chronic out-patient population.

Methods. We performed a prospective observational study in seven chronic haemodialysis units over a 2.5 year period. Patients who were diagnosed as having their initial TCC-associated bacteraemia within the study period were followed for 3 months. All episodes of Pseudomonas TCC bacteraemia were identified, and univariate analyses were performed to compare Pseudomonas bacteraemia with non-Pseudomonas bacteraemia.

Results. During the study period, 219 episodes of TCC bacteraemia were identified; 18 had a Pseudomonas isolate (8%). Pseudomonas bacteraemia episodes were associated with a significantly higher risk of not receiving appropriate initial antibiotics (odds ratio = 3.6, P = 0.02). There were no deaths in the Pseudomonas bacteraemia group, whereas 19% died in the non-Pseudomonas group. The TCC was removed in 89% of Pseudomonas bacteraemias. There were no significant risk factors for acquiring a Pseudomonas isolate, and no difference in recurrent bacteraemia or infectious complication rates between the groups.

Conclusions. In haemodialysis patients with a TCC-associated Pseudomonas bacteraemia, outcomes are remarkably good. This may be because the source of Pseudomonas infection was removed in most cases. Initial antibiotic coverage lacking anti-Pseudomonas activity was not associated with increased mortality.

Keywords: bacteraemia; catheter; Gram negative bacilli; haemodialysis; Pseudomonas.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.