Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on January 5, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfk030
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/4/962    most recent
gfk030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwenger, V.
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwenger, V.
Right arrow Articles by Ritz, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received June 9, 2005
Accepted December 7, 2005

Original Article

Late referral - a major cause of poor outcome in the very elderly dialysis patient

Vedat Schwenger 1 *, Christian Morath 1, Alex Hofmann 1, Oskar Hoffmann 2, Martin Zeier 1, and Eberhard Ritz 1

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany
2 Section of Medical Informatics, FH Gießen/Friedberg, University of Applied Sciences, Friedberg, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vedat Schwenger, E-mail: vedat.schwenger{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de



  Abstract

Background. The population of incident dialysis patients is progressively ageing and dialysis outcome is particularly poor in the elderly. There is little documentation whether late referral is more frequent in the very elderly (≥75 years) as compared with non-elderly patients and whether it contributes, at least in part, to their particularly poor outcome.

Methods. In a retrospective single center study we assessed all consecutive patients (n = 254) who had been admitted to haemodialysis between 1998 and 2001. Outcome in relation to the interval between the time of referral and start of dialysis was compared in very elderly and non-elderly patients. According to a previous analysis in our center major adverse outcome is seen in patients referred ≤8 weeks before the start of dialysis. For the present study this time interval was therefore operationally defined as ‘late referral’.

Results. Expectedly 1 year after start of dialysis mortality was higher (31%) in the very elderly compared with younger patients (19%). The interval between referral and first dialysis was less in patients ≥75 years (median interval 3.5 weeks) compared with patients <75 years (median 20.5 weeks; P = 0.007). The difference in 1 year mortality between timely (>8 weeks) vs late (≤8 weeks) referral, however, was as high in the very elderly (42% vs 16%) as in the younger patients (34% vs 9%). The relative risk of death conferred by late referral was also not significantly different in the very elderly (RR 1.80) compared with the younger (RR 2.32) patient. Using multivariate analysis timing of referral proves to be an independent factor with regard to the outcome and time of survival.

Conclusions. We conclude that late referral is more frequent in the very elderly. Although the relative risk of death conferred by late referral is similar in the very elderly and non-elderly, due to higher frequency of late referral it accounts for a large proportion of excess mortality in the very elderly.

Keywords: elderly; haemodialysis; late referral; mortality; vascular access.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Tattersall
Is it really better to start dialysis as late as possible?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 2972 - 2974.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 QJMHome page
T. Ellam, M. El-Kossi, K.C. Prasanth, M. El-Nahas, and A. Khwaja
Conservatively managed patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease--outcomes from a single center experience
QJM, August 1, 2009; 102(8): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NDT PlusHome page
G. Baer, N. Lameire, and W. Van Biesen
Late referral of patients with end-stage renal disease: an in-depth review and suggestions for further actions
NDT Plus, April 29, 2009; (2009) sfp050v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CJASNHome page
T. Hasegawa, J. L. Bragg-Gresham, S. Yamazaki, S. Fukuhara, T. Akizawa, W. Kleophas, R. Greenwood, and R. L. Pisoni
Greater First-Year Survival on Hemodialysis in Facilities in Which Patients Are Provided Earlier and More Frequent Pre-nephrology Visits
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2009; 4(3): 595 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. E. M. Murtagh, J. E. Marsh, P. Donohoe, N. J. Ekbal, N. S. Sheerin, and F. E. Harris
Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1955 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.