NDT Advance Access published online on December 2, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi296
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Intensive Care, Policlinico Umberto I, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Department of Nephrology, St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background. Several controversies have developed over acute renal failure (ARF) definition and treatment: which approach to patient care is most desirable and which form of renal replacement therapy (RRT) should be applied is an everyday matter of debate. There is also disagreement on clinical practice for RRT including the best timing to start, vascular access, anti-coagulation, membranes, equipment and finally, if continuous or intermittent techniques should be preferred. In this lack of harmony, the epidemiology of ARF has recently displayed an outbreak of cases in the intensive care units and nephrologists and intensivists are now called to work together in the case of such a syndrome. Subjects and methods. We report on the responses of 560 contributors, mostly coming from Europe, to a questionnaire submitted during the third International Course on Critical Care Nephrology held in Vicenza, Italy in June 2004. The questionnaire was divided into several sections concerning demographic and medical information, definition of ARF, practice of RRT, current opinions about clinical advantages and problems related to different RRTs and modalities, and beliefs on alternative indications to extracorporeal treatments. Results. More then 200 different definitions of ARF and about 90 RRT start criteria were reported. Oliguria and RIFLE (an acronym classifying ARF in different levels of severity: Risk of renal dysfunction; Injury to the kidney; Failure of kidney function; Loss of kidney function; End-stage kidney disease.) were the most frequent criteria used to define ARF. In 10% of centres all forms of renal replacement techniques are available, and in 70% of cases two or more different techniques are available: absolute analysis of different techniques showed that continuous renal replacement therapies are utilized by 511 specialists (91%), intermittent haemodialysis by 387 (69%) and sustained low efficiency dialysis by 136 (24%). Treatment prescription showed significant differences among specialists, 60% of intensivists being uncertain on RRT dose prescription compared to 40% of nephrologists (P = 0.002). The most frequently selected dosage was ‘35 ml/kg/h’ for urea (25%) and creatinine targets (26%), and ‘2-3 l/h’ for the septic dose (25%). Of the participants, 90% said that they used RRT for non-renal indications, 60% although responders admitted the lack of scientific evidence as a limiting factor to its use. Conclusions. New classifications such as RIFLE criteria might improve well-known uncertainty about ARF definition. Different RRT techniques are available in most centres, but a general lack of treatment dose standardization is noted by our survey. Non-renal indications to RRT still need to find a definitive role in routine practice.
Received July 12, 2005
Accepted November 8, 2005
Original Article
Practice patterns in the management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient: an international survey
Zaccaria Ricci 1 *,
Claudio Ronco 2,
Giuseppe D'amico 3,
Riccardo De Felice 3,
Stefano Rossi 3,
Irene Bolgan 2,
Monica Bonello 2,
Nereo Zamperetti 4,
Dimitris Petras 2,
Gabriella Salvatori 5,
Maurizio Dan 4,
and
Pasquale Piccinni 4
2 Department of Nephrology, St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
3 Department of Intensive Care, Policlinico Umberto I, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
4 Department of Intensive Care, St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
5 Department of Intensive Care, Policlinico Gemelli, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy; Department of Nephrology, St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
Zaccaria Ricci, E-mail: z.ricci{at}libero.it
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Elahi, S. Asopa, A. Pflueger, N. Hakim, and B. Matata Acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: impact of early versus late haemofiltration on morbidity and mortality Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 854 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Levin, J. A. Kellum, R. L. Mehta, and for the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) Acute Kidney Injury: Toward an Integrated Understanding through Development of a Research Agenda Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 862 - 863. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Gibney, E. Hoste, E. A. Burdmann, T. Bunchman, V. Kher, R. Viswanathan, R. L. Mehta, and C. Ronco Timing of Initiation and Discontinuation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI: Unanswered Key Questions Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 876 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. John and K.-U. Eckardt Renal Replacement Strategies in the ICU Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1379 - 1388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cerda, M. Cerda, P. Kilcullen, and J. Prendergast In severe acute kidney injury, a higher serum creatinine is paradoxically associated with better patient survival Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2781 - 2784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Overberger, M. Pesacreta, P. M. Palevsky, and for the VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Management of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: A Survey of Practitioner Prescribing Practices Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 623 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Mehta Comparing Dialysis Modalities for Critically Ill Patients: Are We Barking up the Wrong Tree? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 413 - 414. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Ali, I. Khan, W. Simpson, G. Prescott, J. Townend, W. Smith, and A. MacLeod Incidence and Outcomes in Acute Kidney Injury: A Comprehensive Population-Based Study J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1292 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Lameire, W. Van Biesen, and R. Vanholder The Rise of Prevalence and the Fall of Mortality of Patients with Acute Renal Failure: What the Analysis of Two Databases Does and Does Not Tell Us J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 923 - 925. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|