Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on November 9, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi251
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/4    most recent
gfi251v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutkowski, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rutkowski, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received April 13, 2005
Accepted October 9, 2005


Editorial Comment

Highlights of the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy in Central and Eastern Europe

Boleslaw Rutkowski 1

1 Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Medical University, Gdansk, Poland



  Abstract

Background. In the past 15 years, dramatic political and economic changes have occurred in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) which also had a positive impact on the availability of renal replacement therapy. The aim of the present study was to analyse the progress achieved in the new millennium.

Methods. Data from 18 CEE countries collected during two independent surveys (1999 and 2002) were validated using information from national and ERA-EDTA registries, and analysed.

Results. The data collected from 18 CEE countries clearly document further development and improvement of renal replacement therapy in this region of Europe. In 63% of countries, the incidence rate had become comparable with that observed in more developed European countries. The two main modalities of dialysis, i.e. haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, are used. The frequency of the use of PD varies between 0.5% and nearly 37%. Privatization of dialysis units has started in 18 CEE countries. Currently between 2.5% (Russia) and 90% (Hungary) of patients are treated in non-public centres. Renal transplantation is quite well developed in half of the CEE states. In the states on the territory of the former Soviet Union, substantial progress in renal replacement therapy was achieved in the Baltic states, but the development in Byelorussia and Russia is still unsatisfactory.

Conclusion. The availability and outcome of renal replacement therapy in the majority of states in CEE have become comparable with what is seen in more developed Western Europe. Nevertheless, large differences exist between individual countries. In particular, definite improvement is urgent in Byelorussia and Russia.

Keywords: Central and Eastern Europe; epidemiology; progress; renal replacement therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. Boncz, A. Sebestyen, and I. Pinter
Public-private partnership in Hungarian dialysis care
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 2024 - 2025.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Rutkowski
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 2025 - 2025.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Viklicky, E. Pokorna, S. Vitko, and On behalf of the Board of the Transplant Society
Commentary on the highlights of the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy in Central and Eastern Europe
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 2025 - 2026.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.