Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on October 25, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi207
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/419    most recent
gfi207v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Covic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gluhovschi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Covic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gluhovschi, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received July 18, 2005
Accepted September 12, 2005


Original Articles

Epidemiology of renal disease in Romania: a 10 year review of two regional renal biopsy databases

Adrian Covic 1*, Adalbert Schiller 2, Carmen Volovat 1, Gheorghe Gluhovschi 2, Paul Gusbeth-Tatomir 1, Ligia Petrica 2, Irina-Draga Caruntu 1, Gheorghe Bozdog 2, Silvia Velciov 2, Virginia Trandafirescu 2, Flaviu Bob 2, and Cristina Gluhovschi 2

1 Dialysis and Transplantation Center, ‘C.I. Parhon’ University Hospital, Iasi, Romania
2 Dialysis and Transplantation Center, Timisoara, Romania

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adrian Covic, E-mail: acovic{at}xnet.ro



  Abstract

Background. Epidemiological data of renal disease are available from large national renal biopsy registries from Central and Western European countries; in contrast, detailed epidemiological data from Eastern European countries are missing. This report is the first review of histological data, over a period of 10 years (1995-2004), covering a population of over 6 million inhabitants and two distinct regions from an East European country - Romania.

Methods. 635 eco-guided kidney biopsies from the Moldova (North-Eastern Romania, 8 counties, 4 754 048 inhabitants) and Banat (Western Romania, 3 counties, 1 454 747 inhabitants) regions were analysed. Data on serum creatinine concentration (sCr), 24 h proteinuria, haematuria, clinical diagnosis, histological diagnosis and complications after renal biopsy were collected.

Results. The number of biopsies performed varied between 10.9 p.m.p./year in 1995 and 11.3 p.m.p./year in 2004. The most common clinical syndromes - as indication for performing the renal biopsy - were: nephrotic syndrome (52.3%), followed by nephritic syndrome (21.9%), acute renal failure (ARF) (12.4%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (10.2%) and asymptomatic urinary abnormalities (AUA) (3.3% of the cases). The major histological groups identified were: primary glomerulonephritis (GN) (66.2%), secondary GN (26.4%), vascular nephropathies (2.3%), and tubulointerstitial nephropathies (TIN) (1.5%) of the cases. Among primary GN's, the most frequent diagnoses were: membranoproliferative GN (MPGN) (29.4%, incidence in 2004 - 9.3 p.m.p./year), mesangioproliferative GN (MesGN) (28.9%, incidence - 10 p.m.p./year), membranous GN (MGN) (11.2%, incidence - 5.3 p.m.p./year), minimal change disease (MCD) (8.5%, incidence - 7.3 p.m.p./year), focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) (11.5%, incidence - 3.3 p.m.p./year) and crescentic GN (CGN) (7.9%, incidence - 3.3 p.m.p./year). The prevalence of membranoproliferative GN significantly decreased from 1995 to 2004. The prevalence of different types of secondary GN was similar to Western and Central European countries, with the particular difference of higher infectious diseases associated GN.

Conclusion. The present data are an important contribution to the epidemiology of renal diseases in Europe, highlighting not only numerous similarities but also significant epidemiological differences in Western and Central European countries, particularly a higher, albeit declining, incidence and prevalence of membranoproliferative GN. This report represents the basis for the future of Romanian Registry of Renal Biopsies and is intended to serve as a source of information for nephrologists concerned with East European renal pathology.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; parenchymal diseases; renal biopsy; renal biopsy registry.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. W. J. van Rensburg, A. M. van Staden, G. J. Rossouw, and G. Joubert
The profile of adult nephrology patients admitted to the Renal Unit of the Universitas Tertiary Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa from 1997 to 2006
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 28, 2009; (2009) gfp535v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. M. Korbet, B. Waldo, M. G. Freimanis, and E. J. Lewis
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 23, 2009; (2009) gfp573v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. B. Hanko, R. N. Mullan, D. M. O'Rourke, P. T. McNamee, A. P. Maxwell, and A. E. Courtney
The changing pattern of adult primary glomerular disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 3050 - 3054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Hussain, M. Mallik, S. D. Marks, A. R. Watson, and on behalf of the British Association of Paediatric
Renal biopsies in children: current practice and audit of outcomes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 3, 2009; (2009) gfp434v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
M. A. Hladunewich, S. Troyanov, J. Calafati, for the Metropolitan Toronto Glomerulonephritis Re, and D. C. Cattran
The Natural History of the Non-Nephrotic Membranous Nephropathy Patient
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2009; 4(9): 1417 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
D.-A. Moutzouris, L. Herlitz, G. B. Appel, G. S. Markowitz, B. Freudenthal, J. Radhakrishnan, and V. D. D'Agati
Renal Biopsy in the Very Elderly
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2009; 4(6): 1073 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. P. McQuarrie, B. Mackinnon, B. Young, L. Yeoman, G. Stewart, S. Fleming, S. Robertson, K. Simpson, J. Fox, C. C. Geddes, et al.
Centre variation in incidence, indication and diagnosis of adult native renal biopsy in Scotland
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1524 - 1528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Naumovic, S. Pavlovic, D. Stojkovic, G. Basta-Jovanovic, and V. Nesic
Renal biopsy registry from a single centre in Serbia: 20 years of experience
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2009; 24(3): 877 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Mackinnon, E. Fraser, K. Simpson, J. G. Fox, and C. Geddes
Is it necessary to stop antiplatelet agents before a native renal biopsy?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3566 - 3570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. M. Lopez-Gomez, F. Rivera, and on behalf of Spanish Registry of Glomerulonephriti
Renal Biopsy Findings in Acute Renal Failure in the Cohort of Patients in the Spanish Registry of Glomerulonephritis
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 674 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Malafronte, G. Mastroianni-Kirsztajn, G. N. Betonico, J. E. Romao Jr, M. A. R. Alves, M. F. Carvalho, O. M. Viera Neto, R. A. M. Cadaval, R. R. Bergamo, V. Woronik, et al.
Paulista registry of glomerulonephritis: 5-year data report
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 3098 - 3105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.