Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on August 2, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi026
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/11/2458    most recent
gfi026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uhlin, F.
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uhlin, F.
Right arrow Articles by Magnusson, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received May 19, 2005
Accepted May 20, 2005


Original Articles

Estimating total urea removal and protein catabolic rate by monitoring UV absorbance in spent dialysate

Fredrik Uhlin 1*, Ivo Fridolin 2, Lars-Göran Lindberg 3, and Martin Magnusson 1

1 Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
2 Centre of Biomedical Engineering, Tallinn Technical University, Tallinn, Estonia
3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fredrik Uhlin, E-mail: Fredrik.Uhlin{at}lio.se



  Abstract

Background. Dialysate-based, on-line measurements of Kt/V and protein catabolic rate (PCR) in dialysis patients have been considered more accurate compared with measurements on the blood side during dialysis. The primary aim of this study was to compare total removed urea (TRU) and PCR, normalized to body weight (nPCRw), obtained by three dialysate-based methods: (i) on-line ultraviolet (UV) absorbance of the spent dialysate; (ii) total dialysate collection (TDC), as reference method; and (iii) Urea Monitor 1000 (UM) from Baxter Healthcare Corp.

Methods. We studied 10 uraemic patients on chronic, thrice-weekly haemodialysis. We made absorption measurements (UV radiation) on-line with a spectrophotometer connected to the fluid outlet of the dialysis machine, with all spent dialysate passing through an optical cuvette for single-wavelength measurements. UV absorbance measurements were compared with TDC and the UM.

Results. nPCRw obtained with UV absorbance was 0.82±0.17, that from TDC 0.81±0.18, and that measured by UM 0.87±0.18, which was significantly higher than the results of the other methods. The difference between nPCRw calculated by TDC and by UM was -0.05±0.06, showing a slightly lower SD than the difference between nPCRw by TDC and UV absorbance, -0.01±0.07.

Conclusion. The study demonstrates that TRU, and consequently PCR, can be estimated by on-line measurement of the UV absorption in the spent dialysate.

Keywords: dialysis adequacy; haemodialysis monitoring; protein catabolic rate; total removed urea; urea; UV absorption.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Uhlin, I. Fridolin, M. Magnusson, and L.-G. Lindberg
Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2225 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.