Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on July 26, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi024
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/11/2385    most recent
gfi024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thanamayooran, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thanamayooran, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received January 21, 2005
Accepted June 22, 2005


Original Articles

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary kidney disease clinic in achieving treatment guideline targets

Siva Thanamayooran 1, Caren Rose 1, and David J. Hirsch 1*

1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
David J. Hirsch, E-mail: david.hirsch{at}cdha.nshealth.ca



  Abstract

Background. We have demonstrated previously that at referral most chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have suboptimal metabolic and hypertension control. Although several studies suggest that CKD clinics improve patient outcome, in fact there are minimal published data describing the actual effect of such clinics on these parameters.

Methods. We performed a historical prospective review of a cohort of 340 CKD patients referred to our multidsciplinary clinic in 1998 or 1999, with estimated creatinine clearance (CCr) <60 ml/min. Data regarding blood pressure (BP) control, metabolic/anaemia parameters, medications, access planning and dialysis starts were collected.

Results. The number of patients followed was 234, 144, 100 and 70 at years 1-4 of follow-up, respectively. Twenty-five percent of the patients were diabetic, and 25% were suspected to have ischaemic nephropathy; mean age was 67±15 years. Although phosphate control improved from referral, below a CCr of 30 ml/min, 27% of visits showed hyperphosphataemia. Thirty-one percent of patients with CCr <15 ml/min had haemoglobin <100 g/l at follow-up despite the availability of erythropoietin. BP improved from a mean of 151/80 mmHg at referral to 137/75 mmHg in subsequent visits. At follow-up visits, 62% of BPs were still >130 mmHg systolic or 85 mmHg diastolic. For proteinuric patients (>1 g/day), 75% of follow-up visits showed BP >125/75 mmHg, despite angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use increasing from 35% at referral to 79% at follow-up. Twenty-four percent of patients started renal replacement therapy, initially haemodialysis (HD) in 57%, peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 35% and pre-emptive transplant in 8%. Thirty-eight percent of dialysis starts occurred within 6 months of referral, but PD was the modality in half of these. Only half of the HD patients started using an aterio-venous fistula, and of those using a central catheter 11 of 24 had been followed >6 months, but only four of them had attempted fistula creation.

Conclusions. CKD clinic attendance was associated with improvements in metabolic and BP control, and was able to facilitate the use of PD even for late referrals. However, even the multidisciplinary model with nephrologists, nurse educators and dietitians was unable to achieve guideline-recommended metabolic, anaemia, BP and access targets for a significant number of patients.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; hyperphosphataemia; hypertension; multidisciplinary care; pre-dialysis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
G. Baer, N. Lameire, and W. Van Biesen
Late referral of patients with end-stage renal disease: an in-depth review and suggestions for further actions
NDT Plus, April 29, 2009; (2009) sfp050v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Lee, S. Campoy, G. Smits, Z. Vu Tran, and M. Chonchol
Effectiveness of a chronic kidney disease clinic in achieving K/DOQI guideline targets at initiation of dialysis--a single-centre experience
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 833 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
B. Sprangers, P. Evenepoel, and Y. Vanrenterghem
Late Referral of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: No Time to Waste
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2006; 81(11): 1487 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Jacobs
Costs and benefits of improving renal failure treatment--where do we go?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2049 - 2052.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.