Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on July 26, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi009
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/2231    most recent
gfi009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rostaing, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rostaing, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received March 23, 2005
Accepted June 15, 2005


Original Articles

Questionnaire-based evaluation of gastrointestinal disorders in de novo renal-transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium

Nassim Kamar 1*, Loubna Oufroukhi 1, Patrick Faure 2, David Ribes 1, Olivier Cointault 1, Laurence Lavayssiere 1, Marie Béatrice Nogier 1, Laure Esposito 1, Dominique Durand 1, and Lionel Rostaing 1

1 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Multiorgan Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
2 Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nassim Kamar, E-mail: nassim.kamar{at}free.fr



  Abstract

Background. Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are one of the main adverse events in patients treated by mycophenolic acid (MPA). The aim of our prospective questionnaire-based study was to assess GI side-effects in de novo renal-transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS).

Methods. Between January 2002 and April 2003, all patients receiving MPA with a functioning allograft at 1 month post-transplantation were enrolled in this study (n = 130). Ninety-three of them received MMF (group I), and 37 patients received EC-MPS (group II). Each month, every patient completed a questionnaire regarding GI disorders.

Results. During the first year post-transplantation, GI disorders occurred in 31 patients from the MMF group (33.3%) and 12 patients from the EC-MPS group (32.4%) (not significant). The incidence of upper GI disorders was also similar in both groups. Diarrhoea was observed in 18 patients (19.3%) from group I, and in five patients from group II (13.5%) (not significant). Its frequency and severity were similar in both groups. Weight loss was observed in three patients receiving MMF. Diarrhoea resolved spontaneously in 10 patients from group I and in all patients from group II. For the other eight patients in group I, the diarrhoea required MMF discontinuation in three patients and dose reduction in five patients.

Conclusions. In conclusion, in this questionnaire-based evaluation, the incidence of GI disorders was similar in patients receiving either MMF or EC-MPS during the first year post-transplantation.

Keywords: diarrhoea; dose modification; enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium; gastrointestinal disorders; mycophenolate mofetil.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. M. Davies, J. Grinyo, R. Heading, B. Maes, H.-U. Meier-Kriesche, and M. Oellerich
Gastrointestinal side effects of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients: a reappraisal
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2440 - 2448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.