Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on February 1, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh664
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/803    most recent
gfh664v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcén, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ortuño, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcén, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ortuño, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant © ERA-EDTA 2005; all rights reserved
Received July 12, 2004
Accepted December 1, 2004


Original Articles

Clinical outcomes and C2 cyclosporin monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: 1 year follow-up study

Roberto Marcén *, Juan José Villafruela 1, Julio Pascual 1, José Luis Teruel 1, Javier Ocaña 1, María Teresa Tenorio 1, Francisco Javier Burgos 1, and Joaquín Ortuño 1

1 Departments of Nephrology and Urology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Roberto Marcén, E-mail: rmarcen.hrc{at}salud.madrid.org



  Abstract

Background. Cyclosporin A (CsA) concentration monitoring with 2 h post-dosing levels (C2) correlates with the incidence of rejection and graft outcome in de novo renal transplant patients. The advantages of this policy beyond the first 12 months remain a matter of debate. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the C2 target ranges on CsA monitoring after the first year in stable kidney transplant patients.

Methods. We studied 142 patients, 94 on CsA-steroids and 48 on triple therapy (CsA-azathioprin-steroids), transplanted for 104±42 months and with a serum creatinine of 1.53±0.52 mg/dl. C2 and C0 measurements were performed at baseline and at least twice more during the year of follow-up.

Results. The mean annual C2 blood levels in double therapy patients showed C2 in 23 (24.5%) of <600 ng/ml; in 53 (56.4%) of between 600 and 850 ng/ml; and in 18 patients (19.1%) of >850 ng/ml. In the triple therapy group, C2 in 12 (25%) was <500 ng/ml, in 24 (50%) between 500 and 700 ng/ml and in 12 patients (25%) >700 ng/ml. In both groups, higher C2 levels were associated with a better absorption of the drug measured by the ratio C2/C0 and C2/dose. There were no differences in incidence of infections, need for hospitalization and the presence of hypertension, hyperuricaemia, hypercholesterolaemia or diabetes between patients with low and high C2 blood levels. However, serum creatinine was higher in triple therapy patients with lower C0 levels (P = 0.004). In 135 patients (90 on double and 45 on triple therapy), renal function remained stable during follow-up and 120 of them (89%) had C2 values under the recommended ranges.

Conclusions. C2 monitoring in maintenance patients enabled us to identify overexposure to CsA. Target levels of C2 should be adjusted according to the immunosuppressive regime. C2 levels between 600 and 800 ng/ml in double therapy patients and between 500 and 700 ng/ml in triple therapy patients are sufficient to give an adequate immunosuppression. The superiority of C2 with respect to C0 levels could not be demonstrated.

Keywords: C2 monitoring; cyclosporin A; kidney transplant.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.