Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on January 12, 2005

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh644
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/598    most recent
gfh644v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez-Grande, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, T.
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez-Grande, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant © ERA-EDTA 2005; all rights reserved
Received March 26, 2004
Accepted September 24, 2004


Original Articles

The timely construction of arteriovenous fistulae: a key to reducing morbidity and mortality and to improving cost management

Teresa Ortega 1*, Francisco Ortega 1, Carmen Diaz-Corte 2, Pablo Rebollo 1, Jose Ma Baltar 2, and Jaime Alvarez-Grande 2

1 Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Health Outcomes Research Unit, Nephrology Service, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain; Institute Reina Sofia, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
2 Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Health Outcomes Research Unit, Nephrology Service, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Teresa Ortega, E-mail: tortega{at}hca.es



  Abstract

Background. Some investigators have shown that the initial placement of a catheter or graft, instead of the timely construction of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), late referral to nephrology services and unplanned dialysis increase morbidity and mortality in chronic haemodialysis (CHD) patients. Furthermore, a delay in providing an adequate AVF entails significant increases in treatment-related costs. This study was limited to the analysis of the effects of the lack of an adequate vascular access for CHD on morbidity and mortality.

Methods. According to the vascular access they had in the first 3 months of CHD treatment 96 patients were divided into three groups (VA group): Group 1 (G1), having an adequate AVF in the first 3 months; Group 2 (G2), starting with a catheter but finishing with an AVF; and Group 3 (G3) starting and finishing with a catheter. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with survival, and the standardized mortality index (SMI) was calculated. Finally, we studied cost-effectiveness.

Results. Time-dependent Cox regression and logistic regression analyses showed the statistically significant variable to be the VA group. To ensure that mortality was comparable between VA groups, eliminating age bias, the findings were adjusted applying SMI. G1 patients appear to have a lesser risk of death (relative risk, 0.39) than G2 and G3 patients, as do G2 relative to G3 patients. Also, after adjustment with SMI, patients over 65 years, presumably at greater risk of death, have a lower mortality than the ≤65 age group. Patients with an adequate and functioning AVF lived longer than the others, and the cost of each ‘death prevented’ was lower ({euro}3318/patient).

Conclusions. The lack of an adequate AVF at the start of haemodialysis decreases survival significantly--even if patients are not diabetic, are referred to a nephrologist early and planned haemodialysis is initiated. It also increases the cost of each prevented death.

Keywords: arteriovenous fistula; cost-effectiveness; chronic haemodialysis; morbidity; mortality.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Tattersall
Is it really better to start dialysis as late as possible?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 2972 - 2974.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
L. M. Moist, L. Trpeski, Y. Na, and C. E. Lok
Increased Hemodialysis Catheter Use in Canada and Associated Mortality Risk: Data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry 2001-2004
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2008; 3(6): 1726 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Lobbedez, A. Lecouf, M. Ficheux, P. Henri, B. H. de Ligny, and J.-P. Ryckelynck
Is rapid initiation of peritoneal dialysis feasible in unplanned dialysis patients? A single-centre experience
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3290 - 3294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M. Zamyadi, and M. Nafar
Assessment of management and treatment responses in haemodialysis patients from Tehran province, Iran
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 288 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. E. Owen, R. J. Walker, L. Edgell, J. Collie, L. Douglas, T. D. Hewitson, and G. J. Becker
Implementation of a pre-dialysis clinical pathway for patients with chronic kidney disease
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.