Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on December 7, 2004

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh585
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/147    most recent
gfh585v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved
Received July 6, 2004
Accepted October 13, 2004


Original Articles

The short- and long-term impact of multi-disciplinary clinics in addition to standard nephrology care on patient outcomes

Bryan M. Curtis 1, Pietro Ravani 2, F. Malberti 2, Fiona Kennett 3, Paul A. Taylor 3, Ognjenka Djurdjev 4, and Adeera Levin 3*

1 Division of Nephrology, Patient Research Center, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
2 Divisione di Nefrologia e dialisi, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Italy
3 Division of Nephrology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Canada
4 Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHEOS), St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adeera Levin, E-mail: alevin{at}providencehealth.bc.ca



  Abstract

Background. This two country case control study of incident dialysis patients evaluates the outcomes of patients exposed to formalized multi-disciplinary clinic (MDC) programmes vs standard nephrologist care.

Methods. Patients commencing dialysis in two centres (Vancouver, Canada and Cremona, Italy) were evaluated at and after dialysis start, as a function of MDC exposure vs nephrologist care alone. Only chronic kidney disease patients, with longer than 3 months of exposure to nephrology care, who had not previously received kidney replacement therapy were included. Study outcomes included laboratory parameters and survival. The MDC was similar in both countries and average exposure was 6-8 h per patient-year, as compared to 2-4 h for standard care. All patients had equal access to resources prior to dialysis and with respect to dialysis start, as all had been referred to the same local nephrology practices.

Results. During the evaluation period 288 patients commenced dialysis after receiving more than 3 months nephrology care prior to dialysis. There were no major demographic differences between the cohorts. Mean duration of nephrology care prior to dialysis was 42 months, and dialysis was initiated at similar low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), though statistically significantly different (7.0 and 8.4 ml/min/m2, P = 0.001). The MDC patients had higher haemoglobin (102 vs 90 g/l, P<0.0001), albumin (37.0 vs 34.8 g/l, P = 0.002) and calcium levels (2.29 vs 2.16 mmol/l, P<0.0001) at dialysis start. Survival was significantly better in the MDC group demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.01). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated standard nephrology clinic vs MDC attendance was a statistically significant independent predictor of death (hazards ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.28) after adjusting for other variables known to impact outcomes.

Conclusions. This analysis of outcomes in two different countries suggests that despite equal and long exposure to nephrology care prior to dialysis, there appears to be an association of survival advantage for those patients exposed to formalized clinic care in addition to standard nephrologist follow-up. While other known predictors of survival such as adequacy of dialysis and severity of illness measures were not included in the model, those parameters require time on dialysis to be accumulated. Thus, the data do suggest that knowledge of patient status at the time of dialysis start is important. Further research is needed to determine which specific components of care both prior to dialysis and after its commencement are most important with respect to outcomes.

Keywords: chronic disease management; chronic kidney disease; multi-disciplinary clinic; nephrology; outcomes; survival.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. Menon, R. P. Valentini, G. Kapur, S. Layfield, and T. K. Mattoo
Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Clinic in Managing Children with Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1170 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. v. Biesen, N. Veys, N. Lameire, and R. Vanholder
Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1478 - 1481.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Ravani, P. S. Parfrey, B. Curtis, and B. J. Barrett
Clinical research of kidney diseases 1: researchable questions and valid answers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3681 - 3690.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Buck, R. Baker, A.-M. Cannaby, S. Nicholson, J. Peters, and G. Warwick
Why do patients known to renal services still undergo urgent dialysis initiation? A cross-sectional survey
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3240 - 3245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Ravani, P. S. Parfrey, B. Curtis, and B. J. Barrett
Clinical research of kidney diseases 1: researchable questions and valid answers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2459 - 2468.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Lee, S. Campoy, G. Smits, Z. Vu Tran, and M. Chonchol
Effectiveness of a chronic kidney disease clinic in achieving K/DOQI guideline targets at initiation of dialysis--a single-centre experience
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 833 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. R. Hemmelgarn, B. J. Manns, J. Zhang, M. Tonelli, S. Klarenbach, M. Walsh, B. F. Culleton, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Association between Multidisciplinary Care and Survival for Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 993 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
B. Sprangers, P. Evenepoel, and Y. Vanrenterghem
Late Referral of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: No Time to Waste
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2006; 81(11): 1487 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Thanamayooran, C. Rose, and D. J. Hirsch
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary kidney disease clinic in achieving treatment guideline targets
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 2385 - 2393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. C. Mendelssohn
Coping with the CKD epidemic: the promise of multidisciplinary team-based care
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.