Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on October 19, 2004

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh538
© 2004 by European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/12/3124    most recent
gfh538v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blake, C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Meara, Y. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blake, C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Meara, Y. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received March 31, 2004
Accepted September 15, 2004


Original Articles

Subjective and objective physical limitations in high-functioning renal dialysis patients

Catherine Blake 1* and Yvonne M. O'Meara 2

1 School of Physiotherapy, University College Dublin, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
2 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University College Dublin, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catherine Blake, E-mail: c.blake{at}ucd.ie



  Abstract

Background. The utility of subjective measures of physical function as discriminative, evaluative and predictive tools in patients with ESRD is accepted, but objective performance tests also provide valuable information on patient status. The aims of this study were to determine what objective physical limitations exist in a select group of dialysis patients, designated as ‘high-functioning’ on the basis that they had low comorbidity and subjectively perceived themselves to function well, and to examine relationships between the objective and subjective measures.

Methods. Twelve patients (male, 7; female, 5) aged 18-55 years, with scores of ≥75 points in the Short Form-36 Physical Function scale (PF) and low comorbidity (Charlson score ≤ 2) were recruited for comparison with age and sex-matched sedentary controls. Objective performance measures included vibration perception threshold (VPT), peak quadriceps isokinetic and isometric muscle torque, time to reach peak isometric torque, balance (body sway with eyes open and closed), temporal gait parameters and the sit to stand test (STST).

Results. Dialysis patients demonstrated significant deficits by comparison with controls in subjective PF score (P<0.001), VPT (P<0.01), quadriceps isometric and isokinetic torque (P<0.05, P<0.005), body sway with eyes open (P<0.01) and closed (P<0.05), self selected (P<0.005) and maximum (P<0.01) walk speed, duration of gait cycle (P<0.05) and STST (P<0.001). There was significant agreement between the subjective PF score and VTP (P<0.01), isokinetic torque (P<0.05), body sway with eyes open (P<0.05) and closed (P<0.05), self-selected walk speed (P<0.01) and STST (P<0.01).

Conclusions. Subtle but significant deficits in subjective and objective physical function existed even in this select group of dialysis patients. These findings define in more detail the underlying neuromuscular impairments and support the early implementation of active targeted rehabilitation programmes. The subjective and objective measures used here offer a useful panel of tests for clinical use in high-functioning dialysis patients.

Keywords: dialysis; measurement; objective physical performance; rehabilitation; subjective physical function.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
E. L. Hartmann, D. Kitzman, M. Rocco, X. Leng, H. Klepin, M. Gordon, J. Rejeski, M. Berry, and S. Kritchevsky
Physical Function in Older Candidates for Renal Transplantation: An Impaired Population
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2009; 4(3): 588 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Lin and G. C. Curhan
Kidney function decline and physical function in women
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2827 - 2833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. W. Meyer and T. H. Hostetter
Uremia
N. Engl. J. Med., September 27, 2007; 357(13): 1316 - 1325.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. W. McIntyre, N. M. Selby, M. Sigrist, L. E. Pearce, T. H. Mercer, and P. F. Naish
Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have more severe functionally significant skeletal muscle wasting than patients with dialysis-independent chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2210 - 2216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.