Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on August 31, 2004

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh443
© 2004 by European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/2797    most recent
gfh443v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mourad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Trevillian, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mourad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Trevillian, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received June 15, 2003
Accepted July 5, 2004


Original Article

Acute effect of haemodialysis on arterial stiffness: membrane bioincompatibility?

Adnan Mourad 1, Shane Carney 1*, Alastair Gillies 1, Bernard Jones 1, Ranjit Nanra 1, Paul Trevillian 1

1 Department of Nephrology, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW 2310, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: scarney{at}mail.newcastle.edu.au.



  Abstract

Background. Repetitive endothelial damage from dialysis membrane incompatibility is a probable cause of accelerated atherosclerosis in haemodialysis patients. Consequently pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, was utilized as a surrogate marker of vascular dysfunction during dialysis with two commonly used synthetic dialysers.

Methods. PWV was monitored before, during and after haemodialysis using both polysulphone and polyamide membranes. PWV, an arterial stiffness measure, was calculated from the carotid to the femoral (C-F) and also to the radial (C-R) artery. In a further group, PWV was monitored while polysulphone and polyamide membranes were perfused with blood without dialysate.

Results. Mean aortic (C-F) PWV was lower during dialysis with the polyamide membrane, being 14 and 16% less following 75 and 135 min of dialysis (P<0.05) in 24 patients. Because intradialytic intravascular volume changes alter PWV, a subgroup analysis in 11 patients where dialysis fluid removal during both periods was minimal (<1 kg) was performed, and a persistent and significant increase in aortic PWV was detected with the polysulphone kidney being maximal (40%) at 75 min (P<0.01). This increase was negatively correlated with pre-dialysis PWV (P<0.01). In contrast, the polyamide dialyser did not change PWV. An increase in C-R PWV was also noted with the polysulphone membrane (P<0.05). In the nine patients where membranes were perfused with blood without dialysate, aortic PWV was again significantly increased by the polysulphone (P<0.01), but not the polyamide dialyser.

Conclusions. Haemodialysis with polysulphone but not polyamide membranes acutely alters aortic ‘stiffness’, an effect postulated to be due to membrane bioincompatibility. However, factors including age, time on dialysis and underlying vascular disease, were also found to impact on these acute dialysis-induced changes to vascular function. Since these acute changes disappear post-dialysis, their long-term consequences are uncertain.

Keywords: arterial stiffness; bioincompatibility; blood pressure; haemodialysis; pulse wave velocity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.