Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on August 3, 2004

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh424
© 2004 by European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/10/2456    most recent
gfh424v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehrabi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kraus, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehrabi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kraus, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received April 23, 2004
Accepted June 23, 2004


Original Article

Different impact of normo- and hypotensive brain death on renal macro- and microperfusion--an experimental evaluation in a porcine model

Arianeb Mehrabi 1*, Markus Golling 1, Michael Körting 1, Bahram Hashemi 2, Rezvan Ahmadi 2, Arash Kashfi 3, Peter Schemmer 1, Carsten N. Gutt 1, Payam S. Pahlavan 3, Jan Schmidt 1, Markus W. Büchler 1, Thomas W. Kraus 1

1 Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
3 Department of Experimental Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arianeb_mehrabi{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de.



  Abstract

Background. Despite the growing use of kidneys from living donors, organs harvested from brain dead donors are the dominant graft types used in renal transplantation. It is accepted that brain death (BD) has a damaging effect on the renal allograft, with a lower graft survival. Amongst various causes, changes in renal microperfusion could be responsible. Renocortical microperfusion was assessed during BD using thermal diffusion in a porcine model.

Methods. Two types of BD were induced in two groups of pigs [hypotension (Hypo-BD): n = 11; normotension (Normo-BD): n = 10] and compared to controls (n = 5) over a period of 210 min. We analysed systemic parameters [heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)], aortic blood flow (ABF) and renal perfusion [renal artery blood flow (RABF) and renocortical blood flow (RCBF)].

Results. Following the two distinct forms of BD induction, a stable normo- or hypotension was observed. Haemodynamic parameters were only slightly changed (control group: MAP, 62±2 mmHg; HR, 95±3/min; Normo-BD: MAP, 56±4 mmHg; HR, 104±8/min; Hypo-BD: MAP, 43±3 mmHg; HR, 112±7/min). Solely dependent on systemic haemodynamics, RABF and RCBF decreased in the Hypo-BD (RABF: 142±19 to 94±9 ml/100 g/min; RCBF: 80±4 to 52±2 ml/100 g/min), while in Normo-BD group RABF mildly changed (158±13 ml/100 g/min) and RCBF decreased slightly from 76±3 to 70±6 ml/100 g/min. As opposed to the Normo-BD group, animals with Hypo-BD showed a significant decrease in RABF (reduction of 34%) and RCBF (reduction of 35%) with a sharp drop of MAP (reduction of 25%), however ABF remained relatively constant.

Conclusions. In this model, a reduction of renocortical microperfusion in brain dead pigs was only found during haemodynamic instability (hypotension) and could not be attributed to BD as such. Our findings would support intensive cardiocirculatory stabilization for potential BD donors in order to minimize kidney preservation damage.

Keywords: brain death; kidney transplantation; renal microperfusion; thermal diffusion.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.