NDT Advance Access published online on August 3, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh391
© 2004 by European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Infection, Pan-Pathology Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: william.tong{at}gstt.sthames.nhs.uk.
Background. Nephropathy associated with BK virus (BKVAN) has recently emerged as an important cause of allograft failure following renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laboratory markers in the follow-up of patients with BKVAN. Methods. Serial samples from seven renal transplant recipients with biopsy proven BKVAN were studied. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 76 weeks. Intervention after the diagnosis of BKVAN included immunosuppression dose reduction, alternative immunosuppressive agents and/or antiviral therapy with cidofovir. Serial urine samples (n = 127) were collected for electron microscopy (EM), decoy cell detection and quantitative urine BK viral load using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Serum BK viral load was also measured serially (n = 72). Results. All patients showed a reduction in serum and urine viral load during the period of follow-up co-incident with the loss of decoy cells and negative urine EM. Urine samples that were negative for decoy cells or polyomavirus by EM had a urine viral load <106 copies/ml and a corresponding serum viral load <103 copies/ml. In paired serum/urine samples, there was a proportional relationship between serum and urine viral load with each urine viral load Conclusion. Negative EM and absence of decoy cells could be used as broad indicators of a response to intervention. However, measurement of BK virus DNA level provided a wider dynamic range and could be a better choice for determining the extent of viral control.
Accepted June 4, 2004
Original Article
Monitoring the progress of BK virus associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients
2 Department of Nephrology, Pan-Pathology Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
3 Pan-Pathology Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
4 Department of Histopathology, Pan-Pathology Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
![]()
Abstract
1000-fold higher than the corresponding serum level. Serum and urine viral loads that decreased to <200 and < 106 copies/ml, respectively, correlated with histological improvement.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Goldsmith and S. E. Miller Modern Uses of Electron Microscopy for Detection of Viruses Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2009; 22(4): 552 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hilton and C. Y. W. Tong Antiviral therapy for polyomavirus-associated nephropathy after renal transplantation J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(5): 855 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Bohl and D. C. Brennan BK Virus Nephropathy and Kidney Transplantation Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(Supplement_1): S36 - S46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


