Skip Navigation



NDT Advance Access published online on February 19, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh100
© 2004 by European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/5/1252    most recent
gfh100v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fauriel, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hervé, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fauriel, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hervé, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received March 28, 2003
Accepted November 26, 2003

Original Article

Decisions concerning potentially life-sustaining treatments in paediatric nephrology: a multicentre study in French-speaking countries

Isabelle Fauriel 1, Grégoire Moutel 1, Marie-Laure Moutard 2, Luc Montuclard 1, Nathalie Duchange 1, Ingrid Callies 1, Irène François 1, Pierre Cochat 3, Christian Hervé 1*

1 Laboratoire d’Ethique médicale, de Droit de la santé et de Santé publique, Faculté de médecine Necker, Paris, France
2 Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
3 Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: herve{at}necker.fr.



  Abstract

Background. Few studies have looked at how decisions are made to withhold or to withdraw potentially life-sustaining treatments (LST) in paediatric nephrology. The aim of this work was to evaluate such practices in all nephrology centres in French-speaking European countries, so that guidelines could be discussed and drawn up by professionals.

Methods. We used semi-directed interviews to question health care professionals prospectively. We also retrospectively analysed the medical files of all children (n = 50) for whom a decision to withhold or to withdraw LST had been made in the last 5 years. The doctors (n = 31) who had been involved in the decision-making process were interviewed.

Results. All 31 of the French-speaking paediatric nephrology centres in Europe were included in this study. Of these, 18 had made decisions in the previous 5 years about withholding or withdrawing LST. Resultant quality of life, based on long-term living conditions, was the principal criterion used to make the decisions. Relational aspects of life and the child’s prognosis were also considered. The decision-making processes were not always collective, even though interactions between doctors and the rest of the medical team seemed to be key elements to them. The parents’ involvement in the decision-making process differed between centres.

Conclusions. The criteria used to decide whether to withhold or to withdraw LST are not standardized, and no specific guidelines exist.

Keywords: dialysis, ethics, life-sustaining treatments, nephrology, paediatric, treatment withholding or withdrawal


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. Fauriel, G. Moutel, N. Duchange, L. Montuclard, M.-L. Moutard, P. Cochat, and C. Herve
Decision making concerning life-sustaining treatment in paediatric nephrology: professionals' experiences and values
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 2746 - 2750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.