Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (134)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neumayer, H.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wenning, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neumayer, H.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wenning, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1989) 4: 1030-1036
© 1989 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Prevention of Radiocontrast-Media-Induced Nephrotoxicity by the Calcium Channel Blocker Nitrendipine: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial

H.-H. Neumayer1,, W. Junge2, A. Küfner1 and A. Wenning1

1Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Klinikum Steglitz, Freie Universität Berlin 2Laboratory Institute Kiel, FRG

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Dr Hans-Hellmut Neumayer, Transplantationszentrum, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg 4, Medizinische Klinik, Kontumazgarten 14-18, 8500 Nürnberg, FRG

Despite the development of new non-ionic lowosmolality contrast media, nephrotoxicity of intravascular radio-opaque contrast media remains a severe clinical problem, particularly in patients with risk factors. Widely accepted mechanisms of contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity are disturbances of renal microcirculation due to prolonged intrarenal vasoconstriction, and direct damaging effects on glomerular and tubular cells. Calcium channel blocking agents have been shown experimentally and clinically to ameliorate ischaemic and toxic renal injury. In the present prospectively randomised, double-blind clinical trial, we investigated a total of 35 patients after intravascular administration of contrast media to determine the effects on renal function of a 3-day treatment with the calcium channel blocker nitrendipine (20 mg/day orally, starting 1 day before X-ray examination, n = 16), compared to findings in a placebo-treated control group (n = 19). Despite the fact that baseline renal function was significantly more compromised in the investigational group, the prophylactic application of nitrendipine preserved the glomerular filtration rate, whereas control patients showed a significant (27%) reduction in GFR on day 2 after contrast-media injection (P≤0.01). Moreover, the increase in enzymuria of three different renal enzymes ({gamma}-GT, AAP, and ß-NAG), as well as urinary protein excretion, was significantly ameliorated by nitrendipine. These data confirm previous findings of our group in patients after kidney transplantation, indicating that prophylactic and/or therapeutic application of calcium channel blockers is of substantial value in preventing ischaemic or toxic renal injury.

In addition to its positive effects on renal haemodymamics, nitrendipine may also exert a so-called cytoprotective influence, inhibiting intracellular calcium overload and thus improving mitochondrial respiration. As already demonstrated by others, the non-nephrotoxic superiority of the newer non-ionic, low-osmolality contrast materials is not entirely uncontested.

Keywords: Calcium channel blocker; Enzymuria; Glomerular filtration rate; Nephrotoxicity; Proteinuria; Radiocontrast media


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. T. C. Wong and M. G. Irwin
Contrast-induced nephropathy
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 474 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Tepel, P. Aspelin, and N. Lameire
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Approach
Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1799 - 1806.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
I. Goldenberg and S. Matetzky
Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 24, 2005; 172(11): 1461 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
S. D. Weisbord and P. M. Palevsky
Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 63 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
C. D. Cox and J. P. Tsikouris
Preventing Contrast Nephropathy: What Is the Best Strategy? A Review of the Literature
J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2004; 44(4): 327 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
A. S. Gami and V. D. Garovic
Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2004; 79(2): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Kapoor, S. Kumar, S. Gulati, S. Gambhir, R. S. Sethi, and N. Sinha
The role of theophylline in contrast-induced nephropathy: a case-control study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 1936 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. L. M. Esnault
Radiocontrast media-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with renal failure: rationale for a new double-blind, prospective, randomized trial testing calcium channel antagonists
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1362 - 1364.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
Y-X J Wang, Y-F Jia, K-M Chen, and S K Morcos
Radiographic contrast media induced nephropathy: experimental observations and the protective effect of calcium channel blockers
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1103 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. L. Haylor and S. K. Morcos
An oral ETA-selective endothelin receptor antagonist for contrast nephropathy?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1336 - 1337.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Schindler, C. Stahl, S. Venz, K. Ludat, W. Krause, and U. Frei
Removal of contrast media by different extracorporeal treatments
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1471 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. L. H. HONING, M. L. HIJMERING, D. E. BALLARD, Y. P. YANG, R. J. PADLEY, P. J. MORRISON, and T. J. RABELINK
Selective ETA Receptor Antagonism with ABT-627 Attenuates All Renal Effects of Endothelin in Humans
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2000; 11(8): 1498 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. W. MURPHY, B. J. BARRETT, and P. S. PARFREY
Contrast Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2000; 11(1): 177 - 182.
[Full Text]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. K. Kramer, M. Kammerl, F. Schweda, and M. Schreiber
A primer in radiocontrast-induced nephropathy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 2830 - 2834.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Thadhani, M. Pascual, and J. V. Bonventre
Acute Renal Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., May 30, 1996; 334(22): 1448 - 1460.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. A. H. Kaasjager, H. A. Koomans, and T. J. Rabelink
Effectiveness of Enalapril Versus Nifedipine to Antagonize Blood Pressure and the Renal Response to Endothelin in Humans
Hypertension, April 1, 1995; 25(4): 620 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. S. Kellerman
Perioperative Care of the Renal Patient
Arch Intern Med, August 8, 1994; 154(15): 1674 - 1688.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Epstein
Calcium Antagonists and Renal Protection: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Arch Intern Med, August 1, 1992; 152(8): 1573 - 1584.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.