Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(8):2551-2558; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp085
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/8/2551    most recent
gfp085v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yao, Q.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yao, Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Better preservation of residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with a low-protein diet supplemented with keto acids: a prospective, randomized trial

Na Jiang1, Jiaqi Qian1, Weilan Sun1, Aiwu Lin1, Liou Cao1, Qin Wang1, Zhaohui Ni1, Yanping Wan2, Bengt Linholm3, Jonas Axelsson3 and Qiang Yao1

1 Renal Division, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Center for Peritoneal Dialysis Research 2 Nutritional Division, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China 3 Divisions of Baxter Novum and Renal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Qiang Yao; E-mail: qiang_yao{at}baxter.com



  Abstract

Background. While a low-protein diet may preserve residual renal function (RRF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients before the start of dialysis, a high-protein intake is usually recommended in dialysis patients to prevent protein-energy wasting. Keto acids, which were often recommended to pre-dialysis CKD patients treated with a low-protein diet, had also been reported to be associated with both RRF and nutrition maintenance. We conducted a randomized trial to test whether a low-protein diet with or without keto acids would be safe and associated with a preserved RRF during peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Methods. To assess the safety of low protein, we first conducted a nitrogen balance study in 34 incident PD patients randomized to receive in-centre diets containing 1.2, 0.9 or 0.6 g of protein/kg ideal body weight (IBW)/day for 10 days. Second, 60 stable PD patients [RRF 4.04 ± 2.30 ml/ min/1.73 m2, urine output 1226 ± 449 ml/day, aged 53.6 ± 12.8 years, PD duration 8.8 (1.5–17.8) months] were randomized to receive either a low- (LP: 0.6–0.8 g/kg IBW/day), keto acid-supplemented low- (sLP: 0.6–0.8 g/kg IBW/day with 0.12 g/kg IBW/day of keto acids) or high-protein (HP: 1.0–1.2 g/kg IBW/day) diet. The groups were followed for 1 year and RRF as well as nutritional status was evaluated serially.

Results. A neutral or positive nitrogen balance was achieved in all three groups. RRF remained stable in group sLP (3.84 ± 2.17 to 3.39 ± 3.23 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = ns) while it decreased in group LP (4.02 ± 2.49 to 2.29 ± 1.72 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.05) and HP (4.25 ± 2.34 to 2.55 ± 2.29 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.05). There was no change from baseline on nutritional status in any of the groups during follow-up.

Conclusions. A diet containing 0.6–0.8 g of protein/kg IBW/day is safe and, when combined with keto acids, is associated with an improved preservation of RRF in relatively new PD patients without significant malnutrition or inflammation.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; diet; glomerular filtration rate; malnutrition; nitrogen balance

Received for publication: 28. 9.08
Accepted in revised form: 10. 2.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.