Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on January 20, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(4):1328-1330; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn769
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/4/1328    most recent
gfn769v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weisshaar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mettang, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weisshaar, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mettang, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



How do nephrologists in haemodialysis units consider the symptom of itch? Results of a survey in Germany

Elke Weisshaar1, Uwe Matterne1 and Thomas Mettang2

1 Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental, Dermatology University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 2 Department of Nephrology, German Clinic for Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Elke Weisshaar, Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Thibautstrasse 3, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Tel: +49-06221-568752; Fax: +49-6221-565584; E-mail: elke.Weisshaar{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de



  Abstract

Background. Despite advances in dialysis treatment of end-stage renal disease, pruritus remains a widespread and distressing concomitant of chronic renal failure. The prevalence of uraemic pruritus (UP) across countries ranges from 10 to 77%. Data from the DOPPS study showed that moderate to severe UP occurs in >40% of patients on haemodialysis. We aimed to provide data on how common and how serious a problem pruritus is as perceived by nephrologists in daily haemodialysis practice.

Method. A national cross-sectional survey in 1420 nephrologists assessed information on the number of dialysed patients, gender distribution, perceived prevalence of UP, time-related aspects of UP, characteristics of UP and its association with dialysis and therapy of UP.

Results. Most respondents reported UP to be prevalent in 1–30% of their patients, and 30% reported an association between UP and dialysis. Seventy-five percent reported an undulating pattern. Nearly half the sample suggested a relationship between quality of dialysis and UP. No substantial differences in recognition and management of UP as a function of organizational affiliation were detected.

Conclusions. The prevalence of UP may be underestimated by nephrologists. Large variation in the reported prevalence of UP and the undulating pattern of UP after dialysis may impede the recognition of UP.

Keywords: haemodialysis; itch; nephrology; uraemic pruritus

Received for publication: 19.12.08
Accepted in revised form: 22.12.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Kittisupamongkol
Not all that itches is uraemic pruritus
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2607 - 2607.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Mettang, U. Matterne, and E. Weisshaar
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2607 - 2608.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.