Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on October 13, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(2):639-642; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn567
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/639    most recent
gfn567v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mamode, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, N.
Right arrow Articles by Mamode, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Does nephrectomy of failed allograft influence graft survival after re-transplantation?

Nadeem Ahmad1, Kamran Ahmed2 and Nizam Mamode1

1 Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital 2 Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Kamran Ahmed, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, 10th Floor QEQM Building, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK. Tel: +44-7939319670; Fax: +44-71888767; E-mail: kahmed198{at}yahoo.co.uk



  Abstract

Background. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of removal of a failed kidney allograft on the outcome of subsequent transplant.

Methods. Retrospective analytical study comparing graft survival for patients (1993–2005) who had previous graft nephrectomy with those who had not.

Results. Of 89 patients with kidney re-transplants, 68 had had a transplant nephrectomy (Group I) while 21 had retained failed grafts (Group II). There was no significant difference in the two groups in the PRA level at the time of re-transplantation (37% versus 29%). Mean follow-up was 47 months. Acute rejections in Group I were 49.1% and in Group II, 31.2% (P = 0.20). Twenty (29%) grafts failed in Group I and four (19%) in Group II. One, three and five years’ actuarial graft survival in Group I was 83.8%, 76% and 66.2%, while in Group II, it was 94.7%, 86.8% and 69.5%, respectively (P = 0.66). Five-year actuarial patient survival in Groups I and II was 94.1% and 87.5%, respectively (P = 0.69). Multivariate analysis showed that PRA level significantly influenced graft survival independent of nephrectomy (P = 0.04).

Conclusion. Nephrectomy of a failed allograft does not seem to significantly influence the survival of a subsequent graft.

Keywords: graft nephrectomy; kidney transplant; nephrectomy; renal re-transplantation

Received for publication: 5.12.07
Accepted in revised form: 17. 9.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.