Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2009
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(10):3219-3225; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp347
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/10/3219    most recent
gfp347v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Renal transplantation in systemic vasculitis: when is it safe?

Mark A. Little1, Basma Hassan1, Steve Jacques1, David Game2, Emma Salisbury2, Aisling E. Courtney3, Catherine Brown4, Alan D. Salama2,* and Lorraine Harper1,*

1 Renal Institute of Birmingham, School of Immunity, Infection and Inflammation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK 2 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK 3 Regional Nephrology unit, Belfast City Hospital 4 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Lorraine Harper; E-mail: l.harper{at}bham.ac.uk



  Abstract

Background. There are no clear guidelines on renal transplantation in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive vasculitis.

Methods. We undertook a survey of transplant centres across Europe to assess whether there was consensus about how to manage transplantation in patients with vasculitis. We then identified 107 renal allograft recipients whose primary disease was systemic vasculitis and assessed their outcome post-transplant.

Results. All questionnaire respondents felt that vasculitis should be in remission at transplantation, 16% believed that ANCA should be negative pre-transplant and 40% felt that one should wait >12 months after remission before transplanting. Remission was defined by all as an absence of clinical symptoms of vasculitis, but three respondents (13%) also required a negative ANCA test. Overall graft survival was 70% after 10 years (95% C.I. 58–82). A total of 30 (41% of those with known ANCA status) were ANCA-positive peri-transplantation, while 15 (14%) were transplanted <1 year post-remission. Severe vasculopathy occurred more frequently in ANCA-positive recipients (odds ratio 4.4, 95% C.I. 1.1–16.8, P < 0.05), although causation cannot be determined from this study. Vasculopathy significantly reduced 10-year graft survival to 47% (P < 0.05). However, ANCA status per se was not significantly associated with graft failure. The strongest predictor of death was transplantation <1 year post-vasculitis remission on both univariate and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 2.3, P < 0.05).

Conclusions. In conclusion, circulating ANCA at transplant was associated with the development of vascular lesions in the graft but was not significantly correlated with graft survival. Most grafts were lost due to patient death, which was more likely if transplantation occurred <12 months following induction of remission of ANCA-positive vasculitis.

Keywords: ANCA; survey; transplantation; vasculitis; vasculopathy


* The last two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received for publication: 10. 3.09
Accepted in revised form: 23. 6.09


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.