Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on October 8, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2009 24(1):316-320; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn558
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/316    most recent
gfn558v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helanterä, I.
Right arrow Articles by Koskinen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helanterä, I.
Right arrow Articles by Koskinen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Prospective follow-up of primary CMV infections after 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

Ilkka Helanterä1, Irmeli Lautenschlager2 and Petri Koskinen1

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology 2 Department of Virology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, PO Box 340, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland

Ilkka Helanterä, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, PO Box 263, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. Tel: +35-8-9-47188203; Fax: +35-8-9-47188400; E-mail: ilkka.helantera{at}helsinki.fi



  Abstract

Background. The occurrence and clinical course of late primary CMV infections developing after valganciclovir prophylaxis in high-risk renal transplant recipients are poorly described.

Methods. Helsinki University Hospital district kidney allograft recipients between January 2004 and March 2007 (N = 175) were prospectively investigated. Patients with D+/R– CMV serostatus and 1-year follow-up were included (N = 25). After 6 months of oral valganciclovir prophylaxis, the patients were monitored for CMV-DNAemia with real-time quantitative plasma PCR at 2–6 weeks interval and if CMV infection was suspected. Infections were treated with i.v. ganciclovir or high-dose valganciclovir, followed by 1–3 months of secondary valganciclovir prophylaxis.

Results. CMV infection developed in 12/25 patients a mean of 107 days (range 26–330 days) after prophylaxis ended. Two were asymptomatic. In 10 patients symptoms included fever (N = 7), gastrointestinal (N = 5), upper respiratory tract (N = 3) and hepatopathy (N = 2). One patient with infection had prophylaxis terminated after 5 months (leukopenia). The mean viral load at diagnosis was 49 517 (range 490–325 300), and peak viral load was 84 654 (range 1250–527 400) copies/ml. Five infections were treated with valganciclovir and six with i.v. ganciclovir resulting with negative PCR results. One mild infection with low viral load was treated successfully with minimization of immunosuppression. Infection relapse developed in three patients a mean of 31 (range 15–61) days after the end of the therapy. Relapses were treated with valganciclovir.

Conclusions. CMV primary infections were common after 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis and mostly symptomatic. Relapses commonly occurred. Primary infections seem to be delayed, but were not efficiently prevented by 6 months of prophylaxis.

Keywords: cytomegalovirus (CMV); kidney transplantation; valganciclovir

Received for publication: 7. 5.08
Accepted in revised form: 12. 9.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Lempinen, L. Halme, S. Sarkio, J. Arola, E. Honkanen, U. Turunen, K. Salmela, and I. Lautenschlager
CMV findings in the gastrointestinal tract in kidney transplantation patients, patients with end-stage kidney disease and immunocompetent patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 3533 - 3539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. L. Luan, L. J. Stuckey, J. M. Park, D. Kaul, D. Cibrik, and A. Ojo
Six-Month Prophylaxis Is Cost Effective in Transplant Patients at High Risk for Cytomegalovirus Infection
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 2449 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.