Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 27, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(9):2943-2947; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn116
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/2943    most recent
gfn116v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Effect of a quality improvement strategy on several haemodialysis outcomes

Eduardo Parra1, Rosa Ramos2, Angels Betriu3, José Paniagua4, Montse Belart3 and Tomás Martínez5

1 Hospital Reina Sofía of Tudela (Navarra) 2 Vilanova y Geltrú Haemodialysis Centre (Barcelona) 3 Sistemes Renals Haemodialysis Centre (Lérida) 4 Hospital Ponferrada (León) 5 Biostatistic Department, Medicine University of Zaragoza, Spain

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Eduardo Parra Moncasi, Unidad de Nefrología, Hospital Reina Sofía de Tudela, Carretera de Tarazona Km 3, 31500 Tudela, Spain. Tel: +848-434000; Fax: +848-434111; E-mail: eparramo{at}cfnavarra.es



  Abstract

Background. Intermediate outcomes are associated with the survival of long-term haemodialysis patients; however, outcome variability across centres may result in heterogeneous quality of care. The study aim was to evaluate a multifaceted quality improvement activity (QIA) targeting several haemodialysis clinical performance measures.

Methods. A total (prevalent and incident) of 313 patients from four dialysis units were included. The QIA was based on a multifaceted strategy involving collection of haemodialysis clinical performance measures every 6–8 months, feedback about results, improvement plans and benchmarking, and it was tested in a 3-year prospective interventional study. Two timepoints of clinical performance measures were considered for evaluating the QIA: baseline (February 2003, pre-QIA) and final (February 2006, post-QIA).

Results. Centres showed significant improvement in percentage of patients with haemoglobin <11 g/dl, mean haemoglobin; percentage of patients with Kt/v <1.2, mean Kt/v; percentage of patients with phosphorous >5.5 mg/dl, mean phosphorous; percentage of patients with calcium phosphate product >55, mean calcium phosphate product; and percentage of patients with ferritin <200 ng/ml, mean ferritin. No change was observed in percentage of patients with haemoglobin between 11 and 13 g/dl, erythropoietin consumed; percentage of patients with ferritin <100 ng/ml; percentage of patients with ferritin >800 ng/ml; percentage of patients with albumin <3.5 g/dl, mean albumin; or percentage of native arteriovenous fistula. The percentage of patients with haemoglobin >13 g/dl was increased.

Conclusions. Quality-improvement strategies can help improve haemodialysis performance for anaemia, dialysis dose and bone metabolism. The importance of assessing patients with high haemoglobin level should be stressed.

Keywords: benchmarking; feedback; haemodialysis; quality of care; quality strategy

Received for publication: 27. 7.07
Accepted in revised form: 11. 2.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Labriola, P. Wallemacq, B. Gulbis, and M. Jadoul
The impact of the assay for measuring albumin on corrected ('adjusted') calcium concentrations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1834 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.