Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on February 28, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(8):2666-2672; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/8/2666    most recent
gfn064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The significance of BOLD MRI in differentiation between renal transplant rejection and acute tubular necrosis

Fei Han1,*, Wenbo Xiao2,*, Ying Xu1, Jianyong Wu1, Qidong Wang2, Huiping Wang1, Minming Zhang2 and Jianghua Chen1

1 Kidney Disease Center 2 Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, People's Republic of China

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jianghua Chen, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, People's Republic of China. Tel: +86-571-87236992; E-mail: chenjianghua{at}zju.edu.cn



  Abstract

Background. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI (BOLD MRI) can be used to assess intra-renal oxygen bioavailability by measuring the R2* level, which reflects tissue deoxyhaemoglobin levels. This study was designed to identify the significance of BOLD MRI in differentiation of acute rejection (AR) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) in patients within 6 months after kidney transplantation.

Methods. Eighty-two patients with normal graft function and 28 patients with biopsy-proven AR (n = 21) or ATN (n = 7) were enrolled. Patients with normal functioning allograft underwent BOLD MRI within 2 to 3 weeks post-transplantation, while patients with AR and ATN underwent BOLD MRI within 6 days before or after kidney transplant biopsy. Cortical R2* (CR2*) and medullary R2* (MR2*) levels were measured.

Results. The mean CR2* level was significantly higher in the ATN group (15.25 ± 1.03/s) compared to the normal group (13.35 ± 2.31/s, P = 0.028) and AR group (12.02 ± 1.72/s, P = 0.001). There was a significant difference also between the AR group and normal group on CR2* levels (P = 0.013). The mean MR2* level was significantly lower in the AR group (14.02 ± 2.68/s) compared to the normal group (16.66 ± 2.82/s, P < 0.001) and ATN group (19.47 ± 1.62/s, P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference between the ATN group and normal group on MR2* levels (P = 0.011). There were no correlations between characteristics such as patient age, post-operation time, post-biopsy time, Scr level, HB level, urine output volume, MAP level, CNI trough concentration and R2* levels, except between MAP level and CR2* level (P = 0.029).

Conclusions. BOLD MRI could be a valuable method to discriminate between AR and ATN by measuring tissue oxygen bioavailability in early kidney allograft dysfunction.

Keywords: acute rejection; acute tubular necrosis; kidney transplantation; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); oxygen bioavailability


* Fei Han and Wenbo Xiao contributed equally in this study.

Received for publication: 28. 9.07
Accepted in revised form: 25. 1.08


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.