Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(5):1735-1741; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm843
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/1735    most recent
gfm843v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ranjan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Joshi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ranjan, P.
Right arrow Articles by Joshi, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The role of C4d immunostaining in the evaluation of the causes of renal allograft dysfunction

Prabhat Ranjan, Ritambhra Nada, Vivekanand Jha*, Vinay Sakhuja* and Kusum Joshi

* Departments of Histopathology and Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Kusum Joshi, Department of Histopathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh-160012, India. Fax: + 91-172-2744401; E-mail: kus_joshi{at}yahoo.com



  Abstract

Background. Renal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. The Banff (1997) classification was revised in 2003 incorporating morphological criteria and C4d immunostaining for the diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection.

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of histomorphology and C4d immunostaining in indicated renal allograft biopsies with a clinical follow-up for a minimum duration of 1 year.

Material and methods. Histological analysis and C4d immunostaining were performed on 132 needle core biopsies and 2 nephrectomy specimens from 107 patients from July 2004 to June 2005.

Results. Histological analysis revealed 59 cases of acute rejection, 10 biopsies of acute tubular necrosis, 41 cases of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), either alone or in combination with other diseases, and 18 biopsies of normal morphology. There were four cases of BK nephropathy (BK N) and eight cases had miscellaneous diagnoses. C4d immunostaining was performed on 126 biopsies. Overall, the prevalence of C4d positivity was 45% (57 of 126). Fifty-five percent (28 of 51) of the cases of acute rejection showed C4d positivity including 81% of presumptive antibody-mediated rejection (P-AbAR), 20% acute cellular rejection and 58% acute cellular rejection + P-AbAR. Overall C4d positivity was 37% in chronic allograft nephropathy. Acute tubular necrosis and borderline rejection showed 25 and 50% C4d positivity, respectively. Amongst various histological features, capillary margination of polymorphs and dilatation of peritubular capillaries (PTC-D) showed significant association with C4d positivity (P < 0.005). In cases of CAN, transplant glomerulopathy had significant association with C4d positivity. C4d-positive cases had a higher mean value of serum creatinine at the time of biopsies.

Conclusion. It is concluded that C4d staining is a useful adjunct marker of the humoral limb of rejection, both in early and late post-transplant periods.

Keywords: Antibody-mediated rejection; C4d; cellular rejection; renal transplant

Received for publication: 4. 6.07
Accepted in revised form: 29.10.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.