Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 21, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(5):1704-1712; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm916
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/1704    most recent
gfm916v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ouseph, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ouseph, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Differences in solute removal by two high-flux membranes of nominally similar synthetic polymers

Rosemary Ouseph1, Colin A. Hutchison2 and Richard A. Ward1

1 Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA 2 Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospital Birmingham, QEMC, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Richard A. Ward, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville, 615 S. Preston Street, Louisville, KY 40202-1718, USA. Tel: +1-502-852-5757; Fax: +1-502-852-7643; Email: richard.ward{at}louisville.edu



  Abstract

Background. Membranes fabricated from nominally similar polymers may be markedly different in chemical composition, morphology and geometry. To examine the relative importance of these factors to dialyzer performance, the removal of small and large uraemic toxins was determined for dialyzers containing ‘polysulfone’ membranes of different composition and morphology, with and without fibre undulations.

Methods. Total removal and instantaneous clearances of urea, phosphorus, β2-microglobulin, leptin, angiogenin, complement factor D and immunoglobulin {kappa} light chain were determined in randomized cross-over studies. Total solute removal was assessed from the pre- to post-dialysis change in plasma concentration and the total amount of solute recovered in the dialysate. Trapping of solute at the membrane was determined as the difference between solute lost from plasma water and solute recovered in the dialysate.

Results. Total removal of urea and phosphorus was independent of the membrane composition and structure. Large molecule removal differed significantly between the two membranes, particularly for β2-microglobulin. The importance of trapping at the membrane as a mechanism of β2-microglobulin removal also differed significantly between the two membranes, with trapping being less important for the membrane with the greatest β2-microglobulin removal. As molecular size increased, the contribution of trapping at the membrane to solute removal increased and the difference between the two membranes decreased.

Conclusions. High-flux membranes fabricated from nominally similar polymers may differ significantly in their ability to remove low molecular weight protein uraemic toxins.

Keywords: adsorption; clearance; haemodialysis; low molecular weight proteins; membrane

Received for publication: 10. 8.07
Accepted in revised form: 5.12.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. L. Penne, N. C. van der Weerd, M. L. Bots, M. A. van den Dorpel, M. P. C. Grooteman, R. Levesque, M. J. Nube, P. M. ter Wee, P. J. Blankestijn, and On behalf of the CONTRAST investigators
Patient- and treatment-related determinants of convective volume in post-dilution haemodiafiltration in clinical practice
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 3493 - 3499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Meert, S. Eloot, M.-A. Waterloos, M. Van Landschoot, A. Dhondt, G. Glorieux, I. Ledebo, and R. Vanholder
Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 562 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.