Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(4):1336-1345; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm734
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/1336    most recent
gfm734v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frishberg, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frishberg, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


The outcome of chronic dialysis in infants and toddlers—advantages and drawbacks of haemodialysis

Sofia Feinstein, Choni Rinat, Rachel Becker-Cohen, Efrat Ben-Shalom, Shepard B. Schwartz and Yaacov Frishberg

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center and the Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel

Yaacov Frishberg, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, PO Box 3235, Jerusalem 91031, Israel. Tel: +972-2-6666144; Fax: +972-2-6555484; Email: yaacovf{at}ekmd.huji.ac.il



  Abstract

Background. Improvements in dialysis technology allow replacement therapy for even the youngest of children with end stage renal disease. Nevertheless, the cumulative experience in this age group is limited.

Methods. We compared the outcome of 20 children who initiated chronic dialysis before the age of 1 year (weight 4.9 ± 2 kg, Group 1), with a particular focus on those under the age of 1 month (eight children, weight 2.9 ± 0.34), to that of 14 patients, aged 1.1–3 years when starting dialysis (weight 10.1 ± 1.7, Group 2).

Results. The outcome was poor in the youngest age group; only 3/8 survived to 3 years. Of those who started dialysis between the ages of 0.3 and 3 years, 84% underwent kidney transplantation. The survival of 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year-old patients was 96%, 88%, 84% and 84% respectively. Severe co-morbidities were present in almost half of those who died. Hospital stay was 3.5 times longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 during the first 3 months of dialysis. Permanent central venous catheters inserted under ultrasound guidance resulted in a 4.4-fold increase in catheter survival compared to non-cuffed catheters. Marked blood loss at beginning of haemodialysis (HD) is attributable to residual volume in the dialysis system (15.7 mL/kg/month) and frequent blood tests (12.1 ± 5.9 mL/kg/month). These values decreased 2-fold after 8 months of treatment.

Conclusions. The main factors determining the poor outcome of infants on dialysis are extremely young age at initiation and severe co-morbidities. Despite some disadvantages, HD may be successfully implemented in infants and toddlers, in highly specialized centres with a well-trained nursing staff.

Keywords: ESRD; haemodialysis; infants; outcome; peritoneal dialysis; toddlers

Received for publication: 15. 2.07
Accepted in revised form: 19. 9.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.