Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on November 28, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(4):1298-1306; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm775
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/1298    most recent
gfm775v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



The prognosis and pathogenesis of severe lupus glomerulonephritis

Melvin M. Schwartz1, Stephen M. Korbet2, Edmund J. Lewis2 and for the Collaborative Study Group3

1 The Department of Pathology 2 The Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Melvin M. Schwartz, Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical College, 1753 W. Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Tel: +1-312-942-5262; Fax: +1-312-942-4228; E-mail: Melvin_Schwartz{at}rush.edu



  Abstract

Background. The International Society of Nephrology/ Renal Pathology Society classification (ISN/RPS) of lupus glomerulonephritis (GN) divides diffuse GN (≥50% involvement) into diffuse segmental (IV-S) and diffuse global GN (IV-G). This division tests whether the pathogenesis and clinical outcomes are the same as when similar patients are classified using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification into severe segmental (WHO III ≥50%) and diffuse global (WHO-IV) GN.

Methods. Thirty-nine renal biopsies with WHO class IV and 44 with WHO III ≥ 50% were reclassified using the ISN/RPS and were correlated with pathogenesis and outcome.

Results. There were 22 biopsies with ISN/RPS class IV-S. ISN/RPS class IV-G comprises two morphologically discrete classes of renal biopsies: 39 biopsies originally classified as WHO class IV (WHO-IV) and 22 that switched from WHO III ≥50% to ISN/RPS class IV-G (IV-Q). We will analyze IV-S, IV-Q and WHO-IV separately. WHO-IV had significantly more immune aggregate deposition than IV-S and IV-Q. WHO-IV had lower serum complements C3 (P = 0.05) and C4 (P = 0.05) than patients with IV-Q. Patients with WHO-IV had more remissions (56%) than IV-Q (23%) (P = 0.01), and stable renal function at the last follow-up was less frequent in patients with IV-Q (18%) than IV-S (50%, P = 0.05) and WHO-IV (62%, P = 0.001). Renal survival and renal survival without end-stage renal disease were different when the patients were diagnosed as WHO classes III ≥50% and IV, but the outcomes for ISN/RPS class IV-S and IV-G (WHO-IV plus IV-Q) were not different.

Conclusions. WHO III ≥50% and WHO-IV lupus GN are not congruent with ISN/RPS IV-S and IV-G. The ISN/RPS minimizes pathological and outcome differences between classes IV-S and IV-G which results in the loss of informational content from the renal biopsies. ISN/RPS does not detect pathogenetic or clinical differences among patients with severe lupus GN.

Keywords: diffuse global glomerulonephritis; hyaline thrombi; pathology; patient survival; remissions; renal survival; wire loops; subendothelial deposits; IV-S; IV-G


3 See the appendix for the members of the Collaborative Study Group.

Received for publication: 29. 6.07
Accepted in revised form: 4.10.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Chen, X. Ding, and B. Chen
Value of the RIFLE classification for acute kidney injury in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 3115 - 3120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
S. KOJO, K.-E. SADA, M. KOBAYASHI, M. MARUYAMA, Y. MAESHIMA, H. SUGIYAMA, and H. MAKINO
Clinical Usefulness of a Prognostic Score in Histological Analysis of Renal Biopsy in Patients with Lupus Nephritis
J Rheumatol, October 1, 2009; 36(10): 2218 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Y. Behara, W. L. Whittier, S. M. Korbet, M. M. Schwartz, M. Martens, and E. J. Lewis
Pathogenetic features of severe segmental lupus nephritis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 23, 2009; (2009) gfp424v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. J. Glassock
Multitarget Therapy of Lupus Nephritis: Base Hit or Home Run?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2008; 19(10): 1842 - 1844.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.