Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on February 5, 2008
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(4):1233-1240; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm725
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/1233    most recent
gfm725v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kane, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Garovic, V. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kane, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Garovic, V. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Comparison between gadolinium and iodine contrast for percutaneous intervention in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: clinical outcomes

Garvan C. Kane1, Anthony W. Stanson2, Dita Kalnicka3,4, David W. Rosenthal4, Christine U. Lee2, Stephen C. Textor4 and Vesna D. Garovic4

1 Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA 2 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA 3 Charles University, Hradec Karlove, Czech Republic 4 Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA

Vesna D. Garovic, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Tel: +1-507-284-8045; Fax: +1-507-284-1161; E-mail: garovic.vesna{at}mayo.edu



  Abstract

Background. Percutaneous angiography with iodinated contrast in patients with chronic kidney disease carries a risk of contrast nephropathy, which is independently associated with renal disease progression and increased mortality. Gadolinium contrast is a potential alternative to iodinated contrast for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA), and appears to be safe and well tolerated. The aim of this study was to assess the results of gadolinium use to facilitate PTRA in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Methods. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with serum creatinine (Cr) ≥ 176 µmol/L (2 mg/dL), who had either gadolinium (n = 57; gadoteridol or gadodiamide), iodinated (n = 68; iohexol or iodixanol) or a combination of gadolinium and iodinated-contrast-enhanced (n = 38) PTRA.

Results. Despite similar degrees of pre-procedural renal insufficiency, the incidence of immediate contrast nephropathy [defined as an increase in serum Cr of 44 µmol/L (0.5 mg/dL) within 7 days without other identifiable causes] was lowest in the gadolinium group (3/57, 5.3%) compared to those receiving a combination of modest iodinated contrast in addition to gadolinium (4/38, 10.5%) or solely iodinated contrast (14/68, 20.6%). This was associated with a reduction in the 30-day progression to need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) (P < 0.005). Yet, over a mean follow-up of 40 ± 22 months, renal function outcomes or all-cause mortality were not different between the contrast groups. The type of contrast used had no effect on technical success and both short- and long-term blood pressure outcomes were comparable between the groups. Two patients developed pathology-proven nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy, a serious skin condition that has been seen in patients with kidney disease following administration of gadolinium.

Conclusions. Gadolinium contrast appears to be an effective agent for interventional renal angiograms. Compared to iodinated contrast, gadolinium contrast is associated with a significantly lower incidence of contrast nephropathy and early progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. The risk of fibrosing dermopathy however and remains to be established.

Keywords: atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis; contrast media; contrast nephropathy; gadolinium angiography; ischaemic nephropathy; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Received for publication: 1. 2.07
Accepted in revised form: 18. 9.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Kribben, O. Witzke, U. Hillen, J. Barkhausen, A. E. Daul, and R. Erbel
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2009; 53(18): 1621 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. E. M. Duijm, E. H. Overbosch, Y. S. Liem, R. N. Planken, J. H. M. Tordoir, P. W. M. Cuypers, P. Douwes-Draaijer, and M. W. de Haan
Retrograde catheterization of haemodialysis fistulae and grafts: angiographic depiction of the entire vascular access tree and stenosis treatment
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 539 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
M. A. Perazella
Current Status of Gadolinium Toxicity in Patients with Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2009; 4(2): 461 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
N. Lameire, W. Van Biesen, E. Hoste, and R. Vanholder
The prevention of acute kidney injury: an in-depth narrative review Part 1: volume resuscitation and avoidance of drug- and nephrotoxin-induced AKI
NDT Plus, December 1, 2008; 1(6): 392 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. G. Shellock and A. Spinazzi
MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 1, MRI Contrast Agents and Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1129 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.