Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on November 13, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2008 23(2):701-706; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm544
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/701    most recent
gfm544v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gelens, M. A. C. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Hooff, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gelens, M. A. C. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Hooff, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



Glucose metabolism before and after conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus in stable renal recipients

Marielle A. C. J. Gelens, Maarten H. L. Christiaans and Johannes P. van Hooff

Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Marielle A. C. J. Gelens, University Hospital Maastricht, PO-Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Email: mgel{at}sint.azm.nl



  Abstract

Background. Tacrolimus is more diabetogenic than cyclosporine. However, this difference is only discernible in the first few months after renal transplantation. In randomized trials, investigating the effects of immunosuppression after renal transplantation, no increase in diabetes mellitus has been reported. However, no sensitive technique was used in these trials, so subclinical alteration of glucose metabolism cannot be excluded.

Methods. We, therefore, decided to use an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IV-GTT), to investigate whether conversion from cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, with a median trough level of 120 µg/l, to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with a median trough level of 6.5 µg/l influences glucose metabolism and whether patients on steroids behave differently from those not on steroids.

Results. Thirty stable, non-diabetic patients, transplanted 10 or more years earlier, were converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus without changing their concomitant medication. IV-GTT's were performed before and 2.5 months after the conversion.

Before conversion, 40% of the patients had an abnormal glucose disappearance rate (kG): in 7%, kG was below 0.8 (abnormal range) and in 34%, kG was between 0.8 and 1.2 (indeterminate range). After conversion, stimulated insulin production, kG, HbA1C and fasting glucose did not change significantly. Insulin resistance (HOMA-R) of the whole group increased significantly, mainly due to a rise in HOMA-R in patients on steroids (n = 18). None of these patients developed overt diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions. Some 40% of long-term cyclosporine-treated patients had an abnormal glucose metabolism. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus does not negatively influence stimulated glucose metabolism or insulin resistance in stable, steroid-free renal transplant recipients. However, in patients receiving steroids, conversion leads to an increase in insulin resistance while insulin output remains the same.

Keywords: glucose metabolism; tacrolimus; cyclosporine/neoral; ivGTT; renal transplant; conversion

Received for publication: 7. 6.07
Accepted in revised form: 17. 7.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.