Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 21, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(9):2578-2585; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm241
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/2578    most recent
gfm241v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charytan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charytan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cutlip, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Risk of target lesion revascularization after coronary stenting in patients with and without chronic kidney disease

David Charytan1,2,*, John P. Forman1,* and Donald E. Cutlip3

1Renal Division, 2Section of Clinical Biometrics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and 3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: David Charytan, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Renal Division, Clinical Biometrics, 1 Brigham Circle, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Email: dcharytan{at}partners.org



  Abstract

Background. Rates of restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement are high in patients with advanced renal failure. Whether mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a similarly increased need for short or long-term target lesion revascularization (TLR) following coronary stenting is uncertain.

Methods. We analysed results from 1228 patients enrolled in four separate, randomized, controlled clinical trials who underwent elective coronary angioplasty with stenting and were prospectively followed for 5 years after the index procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to correct for confounding and to estimate the short and long-terms risks of target lesion revascularization in patients with vs without mild to moderate CKD.

Results. During a median follow-up of 5 years, 205 patients (16.7%) required TLR with 59 (4.8%) requiring TLR after the first year. Mild (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74–1.53) and moderate (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.552–1.64) CKD were not associated with an increase in the adjusted, overall-risk of TLR. However, mild to moderate CKD was associated with a non-significantly increased risk of late TLR (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.73–2.69).

Conclusions. Coronary stenting appears to be similarly effective in patients with mild to moderate CKD and patients with normal renal function. While target lesion revascularization is rarely needed beyond the first year after revascularization, long-term results of coronary stenting may be less-favourable in patients with CKD.

Keywords: angioplasty; chronic kidney disease; coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; restensosis; revascularization


*The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received for publication: 18. 9.06
Accepted in revised form: 29. 3.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.