Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on June 5, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(9):2504-2512; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm248
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/2504    most recent
gfm248v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in NDT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klebe, B.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, C. K.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klebe, B.
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, C. K.T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The cost of implementing UK guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease

Bernhard Klebe1, Jean Irving2, Paul E. Stevens1, Donal J. O’Donoghue3, Simon de Lusignan4, Roger Cooley2, Helen Hobbs1, Edmund J. Lamb5, Ian John1, Rachel Middleton3, John New6 and Christopher K.T. Farmer1

1Department of Renal Medicine, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Ethelbert Road, 2Computing Laboratory, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, 3Department of Renal Medicine, Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 8HD, UK, 4Primary Care Informatics, Division of Community Health Sciences, Hunter Wing, St George's—University of London, London SW17 0RE, 5Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury, Kent CT1 3NG and 6Department of Diabetes, Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 8HD, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Christopher K. T. Farmer, Department of Renal Medicine, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury, Kent CT1 3NG, UK. Email: Chris.Farmer{at}ekht.nhs.uk



  Abstract

Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health problem. In the UK, guidelines have been developed to facilitate case identification and management. Our aim was to estimate the annualized cost of implementation of the guidelines on newly identified CKD cases.

Methods. We interrogated the New Opportunities for Early Renal Intervention by Computerised Assessment (NEOERICA) database using a Java program created to recompile the CKD guidelines into rule-based decision trees. This categorized all patients with a serum creatinine recorded over a 1-year period into those requiring more tests or referral. A 12-month cost analysis for following the guidelines was performed.

Results. In the first year, a practice of 10 000 would identify 147.5 patients with stages 3–5 CKD over and above those already known. All stages 4–5 CKD cases would require nephrology referral. Of those with stage 3 CKD (143.85), 126.27 stable patients would require more tests. The following would require referral: 14.8 with estimated glomerular filtration rate decline ≥5 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, 1.11 with haemoglobin <11 g/dl and 1.67 with blood pressure >150/90 on three anti-hypertensives. The projected cost per practice of investigating stable stage 3 CKD was {euro} 6111; and {euro} 7836 for nephrology referral. Total costs of {euro} 17 133 in the first year were increased to {euro} 29 790 through the effect of creatinine calibration.

Conclusions. CKD guideline implementation results in significant increases in nephrology referral and additional investigation. These costs could be recouped by delaying dialysis requirement by 1 year in one individual per 10 000 patients managed according to guidelines.

Keywords: cardiovascular risk; chronic kidney disease; cost analysis; glomerular filtration rate; guidelines; referral

Received for publication: 12.10.06
Accepted in revised form: 30. 3.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in NDT:

In this issue ...

NDT 2007 22: i. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
P. E. de Jong, M. van der Velde, R. T. Gansevoort, and C. Zoccali
Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease: Where Does Europe Go?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 616 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.