Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 17, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(8):2304-2315; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm190
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/8/2304    most recent
gfm190v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teo, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Paganini, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teo, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Paganini, E. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Machine-generated bicarbonate dialysate for continuous therapy: a prospective, observational cohort study

Boon Wee Teo1, Sevag Demirjian1, Kathryn H. Meyer2, Eugene Wright3 and Emil P. Paganini3

1Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, 2Quantitative Health Sciences and 3Section of Dialysis & Extracorporeal Therapy, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Emil P. Paganini, MD, Section of Dialysis & Extracorporeal Therapy, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Email: paganie{at}ccf.org



  Abstract

Background. In 1995, we described the technique of adapting a haemodialysis (HD) machine to produce a composition-adjustable, bicarbonate-based fluid (as our primary source for dialysate) for continuous HD in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute renal failure (ARF). The following studies the clinical effects, biochemical changes and economic costs of this practice in a large cohort of patients at a single centre over the last 10 years.

Methods. The CCF-ARF Support Registry (1995–2001) was used to identify 405 patients initially supported with bicarbonate continuous HD. The registry is a prospective, observational cohort database that captures demographic, dialysis therapy, laboratory and outcome data. All supported ARF patients were recorded from 1995–98, and then one in five patients from 1999 to 2001. We also reviewed records of the individual dialysis procedures, dialysate disposal, dialysate monitoring tests and specific costs.

Results. Continuous HD was performed for 1292 ± 587 days from 1994 to 2004. Demographics [age 59.57 ± 14.41 years, weight 84.2 ± 24 kg, male 65%, chronic kidney disease (CKD) 34%] and ICU mortality (60.5%) were comparable to other reported series. Day 4 solute [BUN 52.3 mg/dl (95% CI 49.6–54.9), creatinine 2.79 mg/dl (95% CI 2.64–2.95)], electrolyte and acid–base balance [bicarbonate 24.12 mmol/l (95% CI 23.7–24.6)] were well controlled. Dialysate monitoring revealed no positive cultures or elevated endotoxin levels. Variable-composition dialysate was achieved and delivered to all patients without adverse consequences. The cost of dialysate actually declined over time (1995 = $0.91/l, 2005 = $0.67/l).

Conclusion. We have demonstrated that ICU ARF patients can be safely, effectively and economically supported with continuous HD using this source.

Keywords: acute renal failure; bicarbonate dialysate; continuous renal replacement therapy; dialysis; mortality


The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received for publication: 30. 3.06
Accepted in revised form: 12. 3.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.