Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(7):2006-2012; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/7/2006    most recent
gfm065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Smet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vanholder, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effect of the super-flux cellulose triacetate dialyser membrane on the removal of non-protein-bound and protein-bound uraemic solutes

Rita De Smet1, Annemieke Dhondt1, Sunny Eloot2, Francesco Galli3, Marie Anne Waterloos1 and Raymond Vanholder1

1Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, 2Institute of Biomedical Technology, Hydraulics Laboratory, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium and 3Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Applied Biochemistry and Nutritional Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Rita De Smet, Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Email: rita.desmet{at}Ugent.be



  Abstract

Background. Uraemic solutes accumulate in haemodialysis (HD) patients and interfere with physiological functions. Low-flux (LF) HD does not efficiently remove all uraemic compounds. We investigated whether large pore super-flux (SF) cellulose triacetate membranes (CTA) result in a better removal of uraemic solutes.

Methods. Eleven patients were dialysed consecutively with LF-CTA and SF-CTA during 3 weeks. Urea (UR), creatinine (CR), uric acid (UA), 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indoxyl sulfate (IS), hippuric acid (HA), pentosidine (PENT), low-molecular weight (MW) AGEs (AGEs) and albumin were determined in pre-HD, post-HD blood and in dialysate. Reduction rate (RR), dialytic clearance and mass transfer-area coefficient (KoA) were calculated.

Results. SF-HD resulted in a higher RR than LF-HD for IS and AGEs. Urea RR correlated with HA (r = 0.59), IS (r = 0.68) and IAA (r = 0.67), (P < 0.05) for SF. Dialytic clearance ranged from 20 ± 5 to 179 ± 20 ml/min for LF and from 24 ± 6 to 191 ± 24 ml/min for SF; being higher with SF for UA, HA, IS and IAA (SF vs LF, P < 0.05). KoA was higher for most compounds with SF-HD. Albumin loss per SF session was 3.4 ± 1.3 g. The retrieved amount of uraemic solutes in dialysate with LF and SF was comparable.

Conclusions. In conventional HD, SF-CTA was superior to LF-CTA for removal of most protein-bound compounds, especially IS. Reduction rate, dialytic clearance and KoA were higher with SF. The SF-CTA membrane is albumin-leaking; however, this property could not completely explain the amount of retrieved protein-bound compounds in dialysate.

Keywords: albumin; dialysate; haemodialysis membranes; removal; uraemic toxins

Received for publication: 9. 2.06
Accepted in revised form: 19. 1.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.