Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 10, 2007
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2007 22(10):3048-3051; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm460
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/10/3048    most recent
gfm460v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilpert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Donauer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilpert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Donauer, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org



On-demand strategy as an alternative to conventionally scheduled post-transplant immunoadsorptions after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

Jochen Wilpert1,*, Marcel Geyer1,*, Przemyslaw Pisarski2, Oliver Drognitz2, Christian Schulz-Huotari3, Anette Gropp3, Heike Goebel4, Peter Gerke1, Sven Teschner1, Gerd Walz1 and Johannes Donauer1

1University Hospital Freiburg, Renal Division, Germany, 2University Hospital Freiburg, Surgery Division, Transplant Unit, Germany, 3University Hospital Freiburg, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Germany and 4University Hospital Freiburg, Department of Pathology, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: J. Wilpert, Renal Division, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Email: jochen.wilpert{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de



  Abstract

Background. Since 2001, approximately 100 ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have been performed in Europe. The standard protocol, employed by most transplant centres, uses rituximab and scheduled pre-emptive antigen-specific immunoadsorption on post-operative days 3, 6 and 9.

Methods. Our centre has performed 22 ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations since 2004, using a different approach; like in Sweden, all patients received immunoadsorptions preoperatively, but instead of scheduling pre-emptive post-transplant immunoadsorptions, we submitted patients to immunoadsorptions post-operatively only, if their isoagglutinine titers (IgG-Anti-A or -B) exceeded certain thresholds. These thresholds were greater than 1 : 8 in the first post-operative week and greater than 1 : 16 in the second post-operative week, respectively.

Results. A shorter pre-operative length on dialysis, a blood-type constellation of donor A1/recipient 0 and 9a high initial starting-titer were identified as predictors for post-operative immunoadsorptions.

Conclusion. Using this on-demand strategy, our data reveal that a titer-dependent protocol reduces costs at no additional risk for the patient.

Keywords: ABO-incompatible; IgG titer; immunoadsorption; indirect antiglobulin test; kidney transplantation


*These authors contributed equally to the work.

Received for publication: 13. 3.07
Accepted in revised form: 13. 6.07


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Keven and S. Sengul
ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: on-demand strategy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1773 - 1774.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.