Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(9):2596-2600; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl119
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2596    most recent
gfl119v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L.
Right arrow Articles by Offner, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L.
Right arrow Articles by Offner, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

Superior long-term graft function and better growth of grafts in children receiving kidneys from paediatric compared with adult donors

L. Pape1, J. Hoppe1, T. Becker2, J. H. H. Ehrich1, M. Neipp2, T. Ahlenstiel1 and G. Offner1

1 Department of Pediatric Nephrology and 2 Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical School of Hannover, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: PD Dr med. L. Pape, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Medical School of Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany. Email: larspape{at}t-online.de

Background. Organs from paediatric donors are often not accepted for paediatric recipients because previous reports suggested inferior graft function for small kidneys transplanted in children. On the other hand, studies have shown that kidneys of adult donors transplanted into children down-regulate filtration after transplantation and may not increase their function to the need of the growing child.

Methods. We assessed 64 male and 35 female (total n = 99) white children aged <10 years (male: mean 5.1 years, SD 2.8; female: mean 5.8 years, SD 3.4) who had received cadaveric kidney transplants at our centre between 1990 and 2005. Mean observation time was 5.9 years, SD 4.0. The children were divided into two groups depending on the kidney donor age: 63 children (mean age 5.0 years, SD 2.9) received an organ of an adult, and 39 (mean age 6.4 years, SD 3.4) of a paediatric donor. Immunosuppression was performed with prednisolone, cyclosporin A microemulsion±mycophenolate mofetil.

Results. Three to five years after transplantation the calculated glomerular filtration rate corrected to body surface was significantly higher in recipients of paediatric organs. The size of paediatric grafts doubled in the first years after transplantation while adult grafts had a stable size. Graft survival was comparable in both groups during observation time.

Conclusions. We conclude that paediatric donor kidneys should be given preferentially to paediatric recipients due to better long-term function.

Keywords: children; glomerular filtration rate; kidney transplantation; long-term survival; paediatric


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Foss, A. Gunther, P.-D. Line, K. Brabrand, H. Holdaas, A. Hartmann, and K. Midtvedt
Long-term clinical outcome of paediatric kidneys transplanted to adults
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 726 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.