Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(9):2583-2588; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl268
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2583    most recent
gfl268v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Nicol, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Nicol, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

Deceased donor renal transplantation—does side matter?

David W. Johnson, David W. Mudge, Mohammed O. Kaisar, Scott B. Campbell, Carmel M. Hawley, Nicole M. Isbel, Daryl Wall, Anthony Griffin, John Preston and David L. Nicol

Queensland Renal Transplant Service, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Prof. David W. Johnson, Department of Renal Medicine, Level 2, Ambulatory Renal and Transplant Services Building, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane Qld 4102, Australia. Email: david_johnson{at}health.qld.gov.au

Background. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the deceased donor kidney side (left or right kidney) was predictive of subsequent kidney transplant outcomes.

Methods. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of the left–right deceased donor kidney pairs transplanted into recipients with end-stage renal failure in Queensland between 1 April 1994 and 31 March 2004.

Results. A total of 201 left–right deceased donor kidney pairs were transplanted into 402 patients. The baseline characteristics of the recipients in the two groups were comparable, except that the patients receiving right kidneys had lower body mass indices and shorter cold ischaemic times. No differences were seen between the left and right kidney recipient groups with respect to operative duration (3.02 ± 0.67 vs 3.12 ± 0.72 h, P = 0.16), warm ischaemic time (0.62 ± 0.18 vs 0.65 ± 0.21, P = 0.09), delayed graft function (4 vs 6%, respectively, P = 0.26) or a composite vascular, haemorrhagic, ureteric and infective post-operative complication end-point (22 vs 22%, P = 0.90). Estimated glomerular filtration rates were almost identical at 1 month (52.7 ± 39.6 vs 51.0 ± 24.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.34) and remained comparable thereafter. Respective death-censored graft survival rates for left and right kidney recipients were 100 and 100% at 1 year, 99.4 and 96.4% at 3 years and 96.3 and 95.5% at 5 years, respectively (P = 0.67).

Conclusions. Although left and right deceased donor kidneys present different operative challenges, the present results suggest that the probability of early post-operative complications, delayed graft function, impaired early and medium-term renal allograft function or death-censored graft failure is comparable between left and right kidney recipients.

Keywords: delayed graft function; graft survival; kidney transplantation; left kidney; post-operative complications; right kidney


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. G. Yarlagadda, S. G. Coca, A. X. Garg, M. Doshi, E. Poggio, R. J. Marcus, and C. R. Parikh
Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2995 - 3003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.