Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 27, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(8):2191-2201; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/8/2191    most recent
gfl068v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unger, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unger, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rossaint, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

Relation of haemofilter type to venous catheter resistance is crucial for filtration performance and haemocompatibility in CVVH—an in vitro study

Juliane K. Unger1,2, Claudia Haltern2, Britta Portz2, Bernd Dohmen2, Axel Gressner3 and Rolf Rossaint2

1 Department of Comparative Medicine and Experimental Animal Sciences, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt-University, Berlin, 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and 3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Juliane K. Unger, DVM, Department of Comparative Medicine and Experimental Animal Sciences, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Forum 4, D-13353 Berlin, Germany. Email: juliane.unger{at}charite.de

Background. Main factors for the overall performance of haemofilters (HF) are membrane features and filter durability without clogging/clotting of capillaries. However, the venous line resistance (Pv) is a powerful force for net filtrate flux resulting in haemoconcentration and thus is enhancing the phenomenon of membrane clogging. Therefore, we hypothesized that catheter type, as it is associated with Pv-levels, contributes to the extent in which filter longevity and filtration performance are restricted due to blocked hollow fibres.

Methods. Heparinized porcine blood (5 IU/ml) was circulated in an in vitro system for haemofiltration (FH6S®—filters were used, Ca. Gambro). Three different sizes of catheters for peripheral vein access (Vygonuele V®, Ca. Vygon) were alternately inserted into the circuit for blood return from the filter to the reservoir. To produce Pv-levels lower than commonly induced by Shaldon catheters, a 14G-vygonuele was used. Pv-levels standard for 11–12 French catheters were provided by using a 16G-vygonuele. To produce Pv-levels common for low-French or tri-lumen catheters, a shortened 18G-vygonuele was used. The respective Pv-levels attained were compared with respect to the overall filtration performance (system pressures, haemocompatibility and sieving coefficients).

Results. Catheters of 14 and 16G enabled transiently maximal blood flow (Qb)/filtration rates (Qf) of 300/60 ml/min and continuous filtration with Qb/Qf of 200/40 ml/min. The shortened 18G catheter reduced maximal flow rates down to Qb/Qf of 200/40 ml/min, and continuous flow rates down to Qb/Qf of 125/25 ml/min. At the end, median values for blocked hollow fibres were, 35% in the 14G-group, 40% in the 18G-group and 70% in the 16G-group. Haemocompatibility appeared to be higher in the 14G-group with respect to various parameters when compared with the other groups.

Conclusions. The flow resistance by the catheter chosen for haemofiltration clearly influenced the filtration performance. Thus, investigations focused on compatibility of catheter type as it related to Pv-levels with the particular method of renal replacement therapy that should be performed. This point could be crucial in reducing filter clogging and haemostasis during CVVH.

Keywords: haemocompatibility; haemofiltration; Shaldon catheters


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.