Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on March 22, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(7):1952-1960; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1952    most recent
gfl069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in NDT
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Original Articles: Dialysis and Transplantation

The direct and indirect economic costs incurred by living kidney donors—a systematic review

Katherine S. Clarke1, Scott Klarenbach2,3, Sorina Vlaicu4,5, Robert C. Yang1, Amit X. Garg1,5,6 for the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network

1 Division of Nephrology, University of Western Ontario, London, 2 Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 3 Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, 4 Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, 5 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London and 6 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Amit Garg, Kidney Clinical Research Unit, Room ELL-101, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada. Email: amit.garg{at}lhsc.on.ca

Background. Despite the many benefits of living donor kidney transplantation, economic consequences can result for donors. We reviewed studies which quantified the direct and indirect costs incurred by living kidney donors, in order to understand the strengths and limitations of existing literature.

Methods. We identified relevant studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE and ECONOLIT bibliographic databases, in the Science Citation Index and study reference lists. Any study which reported at least one cost relevant to donors was included. The accuracy of abstracted data was verified by two reviewers and reported in year 2004 US dollars.

Results. Thirty-five studies from 12 countries described costs incurred by individuals who donated between the years 1964 and 2003. No study comprehensively quantified all relevant expenses—the sum of select costs considered in one US study averaged $837 per donor and ranged from $0 to 28 906. Travel and/or accommodation costs were incurred by 9–99% of donors, and were higher in countries with a larger land mass. Post-discharge analgesics were required by 4–24% of donors, but prescription costs were not reported. Between 14 and 30% of donors incurred costs for lost income, with an average loss of $3386 in one study from the UK and $682 in another study from the Netherlands. Costs for dependent care were incurred by 9–44% of donors, while costs for domestic help were incurred by 8% of donors.

Conclusions. Donors incur many types of costs attributable to kidney donation and the total costs are certainly higher than previously reported. To guide informed consent and fair reimbursement policies, further data on all relevant costs, preferably from a detailed prospective multi-centre cohort study, are required.

Keywords: health economics; living kidney donors; reimbursement; systematic review


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in NDT:

The case for a fair compensation policy of economic consequences incurred by living kidney donors
Claude Jacobs
NDT 2006 21: 1764-1765. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. M. Parekh, E. J. Gordon, A. X. Garg, A. D. Waterman, S. Kulkarni, and C. R. Parikh
Living kidney donor informed consent practices vary between US and non-US centers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 3, 2008; (2008) gfn295v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. M. Just, F. Th. de Charro, E. A. Tschosik, L. L. Noe, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and M. C. Riella
Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2365 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. X. Garg, D. Hackam, and M. Tonelli
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 253 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
N. Boudville, G. V. Ramesh Prasad, G. Knoll, N. Muirhead, H. Thiessen-Philbrook, R. C. Yang, M. P. Rosas-Arellano, A. Housawi, A. X. Garg, and for the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR
Meta-analysis: risk for hypertension in living kidney donors.
Ann Intern Med, August 1, 2006; 145(3): 185 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.