Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 5, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(10):2921-2929; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl313
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/10/2921    most recent
gfl313v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Morgera, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Morgera, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Improved diagnosis of early kidney allograft dysfunction by ultrasound with echo enhancer—a new method for the diagnosis of renal perfusion

Thomas Fischer1,, Sergej Filimonow1, Jan Dieckhöfer1, Torsten Slowinski2, Matthias Mühler1, Alexander Lembcke1, Klemens Budde2, Hans-H. Neumayer2, Volker Ebeling3, Markus Giessing3, Anke Thomas4 and Stanislao Morgera2

1Department of Radiology, 2Department of Nephrology, 3Department of Urology and 4Department of Gynecology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr med. Thomas Fischer, Institut für Radiologie Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10098 Berlin, Germany. Email: thom.fischer{at}charite.de

Background. Conventional ultrasound parameters such as the resistance index (RI) are only of limited use in the diagnosis of early allograft dysfunction. We, therefore, performed a prospective study to compare the value of ultrasound contrast media (USCM) with conventional US in the diagnosis of early allograft dysfunction.

Methods. A total of 48 consecutive kidney recipients underwent US examination after USCM administration 4–10 days after transplantation. Arterial inflow was determined in the interlobar artery and renal cortex using time–intensity curve (TIC) software. The difference in time-to-peak intensity between these two vascular territories was determined, and a perfusion quotient (PQ) was defined as the ratio of TIC increase of interlobar artery to renal cortex. Three patients with segmental loss of renal perfusion demonstrated by Doppler US were excluded.

Results. Nineteen patients had an uneventful clinical course (control group); PQ was 1.2 ± 0.4. Seven patients with a large perirenal haematoma, without rejection had an increased PQ (P < 0.05) and a prolonged time difference (P < 0.05). Based on clinical and histological criteria, the remaining patients were classified as acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (n = 7), non-vascular rejection (n = 7) or vascular rejection (n = 5). RI determination could not discriminate these groups. Patients with ATN (PQ = 1.6 ± 0.7) or non-vascular rejection (PQ = 1.1 ± 0.6) had a lower PQ than patients with vascular rejection (PQ = 2.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.05). The time difference in all three subgroups was longer compared with controls.

Conclusions. USCM might be superior in the diagnosis of early kidney allograft dysfunction compared with conventional US by means of RI determination. Perirenal haematoma, ATN and vascular rejection are associated with characteristic changes of the TIC.

Keywords: contrast medium; kidney; kidney rejection; time-intensity curve; ultrasound


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.