Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on November 1, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(1):208-216; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi188
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/208    most recent
gfi188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zareie, M.
Right arrow Articles by van den Born, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zareie, M.
Right arrow Articles by van den Born, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Brief Report

Improved biocompatibility of bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PDF is not related to pH

Mohammad Zareie1, Eelco D. Keuning1, Piet M. ter Wee2, Casper G. Schalkwijk3, Robert H. J. Beelen1 and Jacob van den Born1

1 Department of Molecular Cell Biology & Immunology, 2 Department of Nephrology and 3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Mohammad Zareie, Department of Molecular Cell Biology & Immunology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: m.zareie{at}vumc.nl

Background. Chronic exposure to conventional peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) is associated with functional and structural alterations of the peritoneal membrane. The bioincompatibility of conventional PDF can be due to hypertonicity, high glucose concentration, lactate buffering system, presence of glucose degradation products (GDPs) and/or acidic pH. Although various investigators have studied the sole effects of hyperosmolarity, high glucose, GDPs and lactate buffer in experimental PD, less attention has been paid to the chronic impact of low pH in vivo.

Methods. Rats received daily 10 ml of either conventional lactate-buffered PDF (pH 5.2; n = 7), a standard bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PDF with physiological pH (n = 8), bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PDF with acidic pH (adjusted to pH 5.2 with 1 N hydrochloride, n = 5), or bicarbonate/lactate buffer, without glucose, pH 7.4 (n = 7). Fluids were instilled via peritoneal catheters connected to implanted subcutaneous mini vascular access ports for 8 weeks. Control animals with or without peritoneal catheters served as control groups (n = 8/group). Various functional (2 h PET) and morphological/cellular parameters were analyzed.

Results. Compared with control groups and the buffer group, conventional lactate-buffered PDF induced a number of morphological/cellular changes, including angiogenesis and fibrosis in various peritoneal tissues (all parameters P<0.05), accompanied by increased glucose absorption and reduced ultrafiltration capacity. Daily exposure to standard or acidified bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PDF improved the performance of the peritoneal membrane, evidenced by reduced new vessel formation in omentum (P<0.02) and parietal peritoneum (P<0.008), reduced fibrosis (P<0.02) and improved ultrafiltration capacity. No significant differences were found between standard and acidified bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PDF. During PET, acidic PDF was neutralized within 15 to 20 min.

Conclusion. The bicarbonate/lactate-buffered PDF, acidity per se did not contribute substantially to peritoneal worsening in our in vivo model for PD, which might be explained by the buffering capacity of the peritoneum.

Keywords: Peritoneal dialysis; acidity; angiogenesis; fibrosis; rats


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
pdiHome page
M. N. Schilte, J. W.A.M Celie, P. M. t. Wee, R. H.J. Beelen, and J. van den Born
FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO PERITONEAL TISSUE REMODELING IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
Perit. Dial. Int., November 1, 2009; 29(6): 605 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
K. Farhat, F. J. van Ittersum, P. M. ter Wee, and C. E. Douma
Conventional versus biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids: more questions than answers?
NDT Plus, October 1, 2008; 1(suppl_4): iv46 - iv50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Zareie, P. Fabbrini, L. H.P. Hekking, E. D. Keuning, P. M. ter Wee, R. H.J. Beelen, and J. van den Born
Novel Role for Mast Cells in Omental Tissue Remodeling and Cell Recruitment in Experimental Peritoneal Dialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3447 - 3457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.